Imaging Classification of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease

María V. Irazabal(Hypertension Institute), Laureano J. Rangel, Eric J. Bergstralh, Sara L. Osborn(Hypertension Institute), Amber J. Harmon(Hypertension Institute), Jamie L. Sundsbak(Hypertension Institute), Kyongtae T. Bae(University of Pittsburgh), Arlene B. Chapman(Emory University), Jared J. Grantham(University Medical Center), Michal Mrug(University of Alabama), Marie C. Hogan(Hypertension Institute), Ziad Zoghby(Hypertension Institute), Peter C. Harris(Hypertension Institute), Bradley J. Erickson(Mayo Clinic), Bernard F. King(Mayo Clinic), Vicente E. Torres(Mayo Clinic)
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
June 6, 2014
Cited by 611Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

The rate of renal disease progression varies widely among patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), necessitating optimal patient selection for enrollment into clinical trials. Patients from the Mayo Clinic Translational PKD Center with ADPKD (n=590) with computed tomography/magnetic resonance images and three or more eGFR measurements over ≥6 months were classified radiologically as typical (n=538) or atypical (n=52). Total kidney volume (TKV) was measured using stereology (TKVs) and ellipsoid equation (TKVe). Typical patients were randomly partitioned into development and internal validation sets and subclassified according to height-adjusted TKV (HtTKV) ranges for age (1A-1E, in increasing order). Consortium for Radiologic Imaging Study of PKD (CRISP) participants (n=173) were used for external validation. TKVe correlated strongly with TKVs, without systematic underestimation or overestimation. A longitudinal mixed regression model to predict eGFR decline showed that log2HtTKV and age significantly interacted with time in typical patients, but not in atypical patients. When 1A-1E classifications were used instead of log2HtTKV, eGFR slopes were significantly different among subclasses and, except for 1A, different from those in healthy kidney donors. The equation derived from the development set predicted eGFR in both validation sets. The frequency of ESRD at 10 years increased from subclass 1A (2.4%) to 1E (66.9%) in the Mayo cohort and from 1C (2.2%) to 1E (22.3%) in the younger CRISP cohort. Class and subclass designations were stable. An easily applied classification of ADPKD based on HtTKV and age should optimize patient selection for enrollment into clinical trials and for treatment when one becomes available.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis