Quality of Life and Satisfaction with Outcome among Prostate-Cancer Survivors

Martin G. Sanda(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center), Rodney L. Dunn(University of Michigan–Ann Arbor), Jeff M. Michalski(Washington University in St. Louis), Howard M. Sandler(University of Michigan–Ann Arbor), Laurel Northouse(University of Michigan–Ann Arbor), Larry Hembroff(Michigan State University), Xihong Lin(Harvard University), Thomas K. Greenfield(Public Health Institute), Mark S. Litwin(UCLA Health), Christopher S. Saigal(United States Department of Health and Human Services), Arul Mahadevan(University of Michigan–Ann Arbor), Eric A. Klein(University of Michigan–Ann Arbor), Adam S. Kibel(Michigan State University), Louis L. Pisters(Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences), Deborah A. Kuban(Hadassah Medical Center), Irving Kaplan(Harvard University Press), David P. Wood(University of Michigan–Ann Arbor), Jay P. Ciezki(University of Michigan–Ann Arbor), Nikhil Shah(University of Michigan–Ann Arbor), John T. Wei(University of Michigan–Ann Arbor)
New England Journal of Medicine
March 19, 2008
Cited by 2,259Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We sought to identify determinants of health-related quality of life after primary treatment of prostate cancer and to measure the effects of such determinants on satisfaction with the outcome of treatment in patients and their spouses or partners. METHODS: We prospectively measured outcomes reported by 1201 patients and 625 spouses or partners at multiple centers before and after radical prostatectomy, brachytherapy, or external-beam radiotherapy. We evaluated factors that were associated with changes in quality of life within study groups and determined the effects on satisfaction with the treatment outcome. RESULTS: Adjuvant hormone therapy was associated with worse outcomes across multiple quality-of-life domains among patients receiving brachytherapy or radiotherapy. Patients in the brachytherapy group reported having long-lasting urinary irritation, bowel and sexual symptoms, and transient problems with vitality or hormonal function. Adverse effects of prostatectomy on sexual function were mitigated by nerve-sparing procedures. After prostatectomy, urinary incontinence was observed, but urinary irritation and obstruction improved, particularly in patients with large prostates. No treatment-related deaths occurred; serious adverse events were rare. Treatment-related symptoms were exacerbated by obesity, a large prostate size, a high prostate-specific antigen score, and older age. Black patients reported lower satisfaction with the degree of overall treatment outcomes. Changes in quality of life were significantly associated with the degree of outcome satisfaction among patients and their spouses or partners. CONCLUSIONS: Each prostate-cancer treatment was associated with a distinct pattern of change in quality-of-life domains related to urinary, sexual, bowel, and hormonal function. These changes influenced satisfaction with treatment outcomes among patients and their spouses or partners.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis