Revisions to the staging and classification of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: a proposal of the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas (ISCL) and the cutaneous lymphoma task force of the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)

Elise A. Olsen(Duke Medical Center), Eric C. Vonderheid(Johns Hopkins University), Nicola Pimpinelli(Florence (Netherlands)), Rein Willemze(Leiden University), Youn Kim(Stanford University), Robert Knobler(University of Vienna), Herschel Zackheim(University of California, San Francisco), Madeleine Duvic(The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston), Teresa Estrach(Universitat de Barcelona), Stanford Lamberg(Johns Hopkins University), Gary S. Wood(University of Wisconsin–Madison), Reinhard Dummer(University of Zurich), Annamari Ranki(University of Helsinki), Günter Burg(University of Zurich), Peter Heald(Yale University), Mark R. Pittelkow(Mayo Clinic), M.G. Bernengo(Department of Medical Sciences), Wolfram Sterry(Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin), L. Laroche(Université Sorbonne Paris Nord), Franz Trautinger(University of Vienna), Sean Whittaker(St Thomas' Hospital)
Cited by 1,408

Abstract

The ISCL/EORTC recommends revisions to the Mycosis Fungoides Cooperative Group classification and staging system for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). These revisions are made to incorporate advances related to tumor cell biology and diagnostic techniques as pertains to mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) since the 1979 publication of the original guidelines, to clarify certain variables that currently impede effective interinstitution and interinvestigator communication and/or the development of standardized clinical trials in MF and SS, and to provide a platform for tracking other variables of potential prognostic significance. Moreover, given the difference in prognosis and clinical characteristics of the non-MF/non-SS subtypes of cutaneous lymphoma, this revision pertains specifically to MF and SS. The evidence supporting the revisions is discussed as well as recommendations for evaluation and staging procedures based on these revisions.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis