Phase I Study of Vorinostat in Combination with Bortezomib for Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Ashraf Badros(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Angelika M. Burger(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Sunita Philip(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Rubén Niesvizky(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Sarah Kolla(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Olga Goloubeva(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Carolynn Harris(University of Maryland, Baltimore), James A. Zwiebel(University of Maryland, Baltimore), John J. Wright(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Igor Espinoza‐Delgado(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Maria R. Baer(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Julianne L. Holleran(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Merrill J. Egorin(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Steven Grant(University of Maryland, Baltimore)
Clinical Cancer Research
August 12, 2009
Cited by 230Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: Vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, enhances cell death by the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in vitro. We sought to test the combination clinically. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A phase I trial evaluated sequential dose escalation of bortezomib at 1 to 1.3 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 and vorinostat at 100 to 500 mg orally daily for 8 days of each 21-day cycle in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients. Vorinostat pharmacokinetics and dynamics were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were treated. Patients had received a median of 7 prior regimens (range, 3-13), including autologous transplantation in 20, thalidomide in all 23, lenalidomide in 17, and bortezomib in 19, 9 of whom were bortezomib-refractory. Two patients receiving 500 mg vorinostat had prolonged QT interval and fatigue as dose-limiting toxicities. The most common grade >3 toxicities were myelo-suppression (n = 13), fatigue (n = 11), and diarrhea (n = 5). There were no drug-related deaths. Overall response rate was 42%, including three partial responses among nine bortezomib refractory patients. Vorinostat pharmacokinetics were nonlinear. Serum Cmax reached a plateau above 400 mg. Pharmacodynamic changes in CD-138+ bone marrow cells before and on day 11 showed no correlation between protein levels of NF-kappaB, IkappaB, acetylated tubulin, and p21CIP1 and clinical response. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose of vorinostat in our study was 400 mg daily for 8 days every 21 days, with bortezomib administered at a dose of 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11. The promising antimyeloma activity of the regimen in refractory patients merits further evaluation.


Related Papers