Genotype-Phenotype Correlation in the Long-QT Syndrome

Peter J. Schwartz(University of Pavia), Silvia G. Priori(University of Pavia), Carla Spazzolini(University of Pavia), Arthur J. Moss(University of Pavia), G. Michael Vincent(University of Pavia), Carlo Napolitano(University of Pavia), Isabelle Denjoy(University of Pavia), Pascale Guicheney(University of Pavia), Günter Breithardt(University of Pavia), Mark T. Keating(University of Pavia), Jeffrey A. Towbin(University of Pavia), Alan H. Beggs(University of Pavia), Paul A. Brink(University of Pavia), Arthur A.M. Wilde(University of Pavia), Lauri Toivonen(University of Pavia), Wojciech Zaręba(University of Pavia), Jennifer L. Robinson(University of Pavia), Katherine W. Timothy(University of Pavia), Valerie A. Corfield(University of Pavia), Duangrurdee Wattanasirichaigoon(University of Pavia), Clive Corbett(University of Pavia), Wilhelm Haverkamp(University of Pavia), Eric Schulze‐Bahr(University of Pavia), Michael H. Lehmann(University of Pavia), Ketty Schwartz(University of Pavia), P Coumel(University of Pavia), Raffaella Bloise(University of Pavia)
Circulation
January 2, 2001
Cited by 1,754

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The congenital long-QT syndrome (LQTS) is caused by mutations on several genes, all of which encode cardiac ion channels. The progressive understanding of the electrophysiological consequences of these mutations opens unforeseen possibilities for genotype-phenotype correlation studies. Preliminary observations suggested that the conditions ("triggers") associated with cardiac events may in large part be gene specific. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 670 LQTS patients of known genotype (LQT1, n=371; LQT2, n=234; LQT3, n=65) who had symptoms (syncope, cardiac arrest, sudden death) and examined whether 3 specific triggers (exercise, emotion, and sleep/rest without arousal) differed according to genotype. LQT1 patients experienced the majority of their events (62%) during exercise, and only 3% occurred during rest/sleep. These percentages were almost reversed among LQT2 and LQT3 patients, who were less likely to have events during exercise (13%) and more likely to have events during rest/sleep (29% and 39%). Lethal and nonlethal events followed the same pattern. Corrected QT interval did not differ among LQT1, LQT2, and LQT3 patients (498, 497, and 506 ms, respectively). The percent of patients who were free of recurrence with ss-blocker therapy was higher and the death rate was lower among LQT1 patients (81% and 4%, respectively) than among LQT2 (59% and 4%, respectively) and LQT3 (50% and 17%, respectively) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Life-threatening arrhythmias in LQTS patients tend to occur under specific circumstances in a gene-specific manner. These data allow new insights into the mechanisms that relate the electrophysiological consequences of mutations on specific genes to clinical manifestations and offer the possibility of complementing traditional therapy with gene-specific approaches.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis