PTEN Expression and KRAS Mutations on Primary Tumors and Metastases in the Prediction of Benefit From Cetuximab Plus Irinotecan for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Fotios Loupakis(Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana), Luca Emanuele Pollina(Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana), I. Stasi(Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana), Annamaria Ruzzo(Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana), Mario Scartozzi(Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana), Daniele Santini(Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana), Gianluca Masi(Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana), Francesco Graziano(Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana), Chiara Cremolini(Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana), Eliana Rulli(Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana), Emanuele Canestrari(Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana), Niccola Funel(Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana), Gaia Schiavon(Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana), Iacopo Petrini(Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana), Mauro Magnani(Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana), Giuseppe Tonini(Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana), Daniela Campani(Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana), Irene Floriani(Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana), Stefano Cascinu(Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana), Alfredo Falcone(Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
April 28, 2009
Cited by 403Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: PTEN, AKT, and KRAS are epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) downstream regulators. KRAS mutations confer resistance to cetuximab. This retrospective study investigated the role of PTEN loss, AKT phosphorylation, and KRAS mutations on the activity of cetuximab plus irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of patients with irinotecan-refractory mCRC who were treated with cetuximab plus irinotecan was tested for PTEN immunoreactivity (ie, immunohistochemistry; IHC), pAKT IHC, and KRAS mutations. Analyses were performed both on primary tumors and on related metastases, and the association among IHC, mutational results, and treatment outcomes was investigated. RESULTS: One-hundred two patients were eligible. Ninety-six primary tumors, 59 metastases, and 53 paired samples were available. Forty-nine primary tumors (58% of assessable samples) had a preserved PTEN expression (PTEN-positive), whereas 35 (40% of assessable samples) were pAKT-positive. Levels of concordance between primary tumors and metastases were 60%, 68%, and 95% for PTEN, pAKT, and KRAS, respectively. PTEN status on primary tumors and pAKT status both on primary tumors and on metastases did not predict response or progression-free survival (PFS). On metastases, 12 (36%) of 33 patients with PTEN-positive tumors were responders compared with one (5%) of 22 who had PTEN-negative tumors (P = .007). The median PFS of patients with PTEN-positive metastases was 4.7 months compared with 3.3 months for those with PTEN-negative metastases (hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; P = .005). Patients with PTEN-positive metastases and KRAS wild type had longer PFS compared with other patients (5.5 months v 3.8 months; HR, 0.42; P = .001). CONCLUSION: PTEN loss in metastases may be predictive of resistance to cetuximab plus irinotecan. The combination of PTEN IHC and KRAS mutational analyses could help to identify a subgroup of patients with mCRC who have higher chances of benefiting from EGFR inhibition.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis