Cetuximab and Chemotherapy as Initial Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Eric Van Cutsem(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Claus-Henning Köhne(Klinikum Oldenburg), Erika Hitre, J. Załuski(Greater Poland Cancer Center), Chung-Rong Chang Chien(Taoyuan Chang Gung Memorial Hospital), Anatoly Makhson(Moscow City Oncology Hospital №62), Geert D’Haens(Imelda Hospital), Tamás Pintér(Petz Aladár Megyei Oktató Kórház), Robert Lim(National University Hospital), G. Bodoky(Unified Szent István and Szent László Hospital), Jae Kyung Roh(Yonsei University), Gunnar Folprecht(University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus), Paul Ruff(University of the Witwatersrand), Christopher Stroh(Merck KGaA, Darmstadt (Germany)), Sabine Tejpar(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Michael Schlichting(Merck KGaA, Darmstadt (Germany)), Johannes Nippgen(Merck KGaA, Darmstadt (Germany)), Philippe Rougier(Hôpital Ambroise-Paré)
New England Journal of Medicine
April 1, 2009
Cited by 3,860Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We investigated the efficacy of cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer and sought associations between the mutation status of the KRAS gene in tumors and clinical response to cetuximab. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-positive colorectal cancer with unresectable metastases to receive FOLFIRI either alone or in combination with cetuximab. The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 599 patients received cetuximab plus FOLFIRI, and 599 received FOLFIRI alone. The hazard ratio for progression-free survival in the cetuximab-FOLFIRI group as compared with the FOLFIRI group was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72 to 0.99; P=0.048). There was no significant difference in the overall survival between the two treatment groups (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.07; P=0.31). There was a significant interaction between treatment group and KRAS mutation status for tumor response (P=0.03) but not for progression-free survival (P=0.07) or overall survival (P=0.44). The hazard ratio for progression-free survival among patients with wild-type-KRAS tumors was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.50 to 0.94), in favor of the cetuximab-FOLFIRI group. The following grade 3 or 4 adverse events were more frequent with cetuximab plus FOLFIRI than with FOLFIRI alone: skin reactions (which were grade 3 only) (in 19.7% vs. 0.2% of patients, P<0.001), infusion-related reactions (in 2.5% vs. 0%, P<0.001), and diarrhea (in 15.7% vs. 10.5%, P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: First-line treatment with cetuximab plus FOLFIRI, as compared with FOLFIRI alone, reduced the risk of progression of metastatic colorectal cancer. The benefit of cetuximab was limited to patients with KRAS wild-type tumors. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00154102.)


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis