<b>Covered Versus Bare Self-Expanding Stents for Endovascular Treatment of Carotid Artery Stenosis:</b> A Stopped Randomized Trial
Martin Schillinger(University of Vienna), Erich Minar(Medical University of Vienna), Gerald Wiest(Medical University of Vienna), Christian Wöber(Medical University of Vienna), Petra Dick(Medical University of Vienna), Stephan Gentzsch(Medical University of Vienna), Schila Sabeti(Medical University of Vienna), J. Zeitlhofer(Medical University of Vienna), Christian Našel(Medical University of Vienna), Andrea Willfort(Barmherzige Schwestern Krankenhaus Wien), Markus Haumer(University of Vienna)
Cited by 42
Related Papers
Balloon Angioplasty versus Implantation of Nitinol Stents in the Superficial Femoral Artery
|New England Journal of Medicine|2006|1.2k
High Plasma Levels of Factor VIII and the Risk of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism
|New England Journal of Medicine|2000|765
Nitinol Stent Implantation Versus Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty in Superficial Femoral Artery Lesions up to 10 cm in Length
|Circulation|2007|515
Sustained Benefit at 2 Years of Primary Femoropopliteal Stenting Compared With Balloon Angioplasty With Optional Stenting
|Circulation|2007|500
The Risk of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism in Men and Women
|New England Journal of Medicine|2004|478