gp100 Peptide Vaccine and Interleukin-2 in Patients with Advanced Melanoma

Douglas J. Schwartzentruber(Indiana University Health), David H. Lawson(Cancer Institute (WIA)), Jon Richards(Oncology Specialists), Robert M. Conry, Donald M. Miller(James Graham Brown Foundation), Jonathan Treisman(Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center), Fawaz Gailani(Kaiser Permanente Riverside Medical Center), Lee B. Riley(St. Vincent's Medical Center), Kevin C. Conlon, Barbara A. Pockaj(Mayo Clinic Hospital), Kari Kendra(The Ohio State University), Richard L. White(Carolinas Medical Center), René González(University of Colorado Denver), Timothy M. Kuzel, Brendan D. Curti(Providence Portland Medical Center), Phillip D. Leming(Christ Hospital), Eric D. Whitman(Atlantic Health System), Jai Balkissoon(Alta Bates Summit Medical Center), Douglas S. Reintgen(University of South Florida), Howard L. Kaufman(Rush University Medical Center), Francesco M. Marincola(National Institutes of Health), Maria J. Merino, Steven A. Rosenberg, Peter L. Choyke, Don Vena(Emmes (United States)), Patrick Hwu(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)
New England Journal of Medicine
June 1, 2011
Cited by 886

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stimulating an immune response against cancer with the use of vaccines remains a challenge. We hypothesized that combining a melanoma vaccine with interleukin-2, an immune activating agent, could improve outcomes. In a previous phase 2 study, patients with metastatic melanoma receiving high-dose interleukin-2 plus the gp100:209-217(210M) peptide vaccine had a higher rate of response than the rate that is expected among patients who are treated with interleukin-2 alone. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, phase 3 trial involving 185 patients at 21 centers. Eligibility criteria included stage IV or locally advanced stage III cutaneous melanoma, expression of HLA*A0201, an absence of brain metastases, and suitability for high-dose interleukin-2 therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive interleukin-2 alone (720,000 IU per kilogram of body weight per dose) or gp100:209-217(210M) plus incomplete Freund's adjuvant (Montanide ISA-51) once per cycle, followed by interleukin-2. The primary end point was clinical response. Secondary end points included toxic effects and progression-free survival. RESULTS: The treatment groups were well balanced with respect to baseline characteristics and received a similar amount of interleukin-2 per cycle. The toxic effects were consistent with those expected with interleukin-2 therapy. The vaccine-interleukin-2 group, as compared with the interleukin-2-only group, had a significant improvement in centrally verified overall clinical response (16% vs. 6%, P=0.03), as well as longer progression-free survival (2.2 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 3.9 vs. 1.6 months; 95% CI, 1.5 to 1.8; P=0.008). The median overall survival was also longer in the vaccine-interleukin-2 group than in the interleukin-2-only group (17.8 months; 95% CI, 11.9 to 25.8 vs. 11.1 months; 95% CI, 8.7 to 16.3; P=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced melanoma, the response rate was higher and progression-free survival longer with vaccine and interleukin-2 than with interleukin-2 alone. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00019682.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis