FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0

Ronald Boellaard(Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam), Roberto C. Delgado Bolton(Radboud University Nijmegen), Wim J.G. Oyen(Radboud University Nijmegen), Francesco Giammarile(Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe), Klaus Tatsch(University of Cologne), W. Eschner(University of Cologne), Fred Verzijlbergen(St Thomas' Hospital), Sally F. Barrington(St Thomas' Hospital), Lucy Pike(St Thomas' Hospital), Wolfgang Weber(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Sigrid Stroobants(Antwerp University Hospital), Dominique Delbeke(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center), Kevin Donohoe(Hadassah Medical Center), Scott Holbrook(ABT Molecular Imaging (United States)), Michael M. Graham(University of Iowa), Giorgio Testanera(Humanitas University), Otto S. Hoekstra(Center for Biomedical Research of La Rioja), Josée M. Zijlstra(Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis), Eric P. Visser(Radboud University Nijmegen), C. Hoekstra(University Medical Center Groningen), Jan Pruim(University Medical Center Groningen), Antoon T. M. Willemsen(University Medical Center Groningen), Bertjan Arends(Radboud University Nijmegen), Jörg Kotzerke(Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam), Andreas Bockisch(Essen University Hospital), Thomas Beyer(Essen University Hospital), Arturo Chiti(Humanitas University), Bernd J. Krause(University of Rostock)
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
December 1, 2014
Cited by 3,259Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

The purpose of these guidelines is to assist physicians in recommending, performing, interpreting and reporting the results of FDG PET/CT for oncological imaging of adult patients. PET is a quantitative imaging technique and therefore requires a common quality control (QC)/quality assurance (QA) procedure to maintain the accuracy and precision of quantitation. Repeatability and reproducibility are two essential requirements for any quantitative measurement and/or imaging biomarker. Repeatability relates to the uncertainty in obtaining the same result in the same patient when he or she is examined more than once on the same system. However, imaging biomarkers should also have adequate reproducibility, i.e. the ability to yield the same result in the same patient when that patient is examined on different systems and at different imaging sites. Adequate repeatability and reproducibility are essential for the clinical management of patients and the use of FDG PET/CT within multicentre trials. A common standardised imaging procedure will help promote the appropriate use of FDG PET/CT imaging and increase the value of publications and, therefore, their contribution to evidence-based medicine. Moreover, consistency in numerical values between platforms and institutes that acquire the data will potentially enhance the role of semiquantitative and quantitative image interpretation. Precision and accuracy are additionally important as FDG PET/CT is used to evaluate tumour response as well as for diagnosis, prognosis and staging. Therefore both the previous and these new guidelines specifically aim to achieve standardised uptake value harmonisation in multicentre settings.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis