Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale.

Thomas Brott(University of Cincinnati), Harold P. Adams(University of Cincinnati), Charles P. Olinger(University of Cincinnati), John R. Marler(University of Cincinnati), William G. Barsan(University of Cincinnati), José Biller(University of Cincinnati), Judith Spilker(University of Cincinnati), Reneé Semonin Holleran(University of Cincinnati), Robert Eberle(University of Cincinnati), Vicki Hertzberg(University of Cincinnati)
Stroke
July 1, 1989
Cited by 5,819

Abstract

We designed a 15-item neurologic examination stroke scale for use in acute stroke therapy trials. In a study of 24 stroke patients, interrater reliability for the scale was found to be high (mean kappa = 0.69), and test-retest reliability was also high (mean kappa = 0.66-0.77). Test-retest reliability did not differ significantly among a neurologist, a neurology house officer, a neurology nurse, or an emergency department nurse. The stroke scale validity was assessed by comparing the scale scores obtained prospectively on 65 acute stroke patients to the patients' infarction size as measured by computed tomography scan at 1 week and to the patients' clinical outcome as determined at 3 months. These correlations (scale-lesion size r = 0.68, scale-outcome r = 0.79) suggested acceptable examination and scale validity. Of the 15 test items, the most interrater reliable item (pupillary response) had low validity. Less reliable items such as upper or lower extremity motor function were more valid. We discuss methods for improving the reliability and validity of brief examination scales to be used in stroke therapy trials.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis