Structured RNAs in the ENCODE selected regions of the human genome

Stefan Washietl(University of Vienna), Jakob Skou Pedersen(University of California, Santa Cruz), Jan O. Korbel(Yale University), Claudia Stocsits(Leipzig University), Andreas Gruber(University of Vienna), Jörg Hackermüller(Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology), Jana Hertel(Leipzig University), Manja Lindemeyer(Leipzig University), Kristin Reiche(Leipzig University), Andrea Tanzer(University of Vienna), Catherine Ucla(University of Geneva), Carine Wyss(University of Geneva), Stylianos E. Antonarakis(University of Geneva), France Denœud(Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Julien Lagarde(Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Jörg Drenkow, Philipp Kapranov, T Gingeras, Roderic Guigó(Universitat Pompeu Fabra), M Snyder(Yale University), Mark Gerstein(Yale University), Alexandre Reymond(University of Geneva), Ivo L. Hofacker(University of Vienna), Peter F. Stadler(University of Vienna)
Genome Research
June 1, 2007
Cited by 177Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Functional RNA structures play an important role both in the context of noncoding RNA transcripts as well as regulatory elements in mRNAs. Here we present a computational study to detect functional RNA structures within the ENCODE regions of the human genome. Since structural RNAs in general lack characteristic signals in primary sequence, comparative approaches evaluating evolutionary conservation of structures are most promising. We have used three recently introduced programs based on either phylogenetic-stochastic context-free grammar (EvoFold) or energy directed folding (RNAz and AlifoldZ), yielding several thousand candidate structures (corresponding to approximately 2.7% of the ENCODE regions). EvoFold has its highest sensitivity in highly conserved and relatively AU-rich regions, while RNAz favors slightly GC-rich regions, resulting in a relatively small overlap between methods. Comparison with the GENCODE annotation points to functional RNAs in all genomic contexts, with a slightly increased density in 3'-UTRs. While we estimate a significant false discovery rate of approximately 50%-70% many of the predictions can be further substantiated by additional criteria: 248 loci are predicted by both RNAz and EvoFold, and an additional 239 RNAz or EvoFold predictions are supported by the (more stringent) AlifoldZ algorithm. Five hundred seventy RNAz structure predictions fall into regions that show signs of selection pressure also on the sequence level (i.e., conserved elements). More than 700 predictions overlap with noncoding transcripts detected by oligonucleotide tiling arrays. One hundred seventy-five selected candidates were tested by RT-PCR in six tissues, and expression could be verified in 43 cases (24.6%).


Related Papers