Adoptive immunotherapy with unselected or EBV-specific T cells for biopsy-proven EBV+ lymphomas after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Ekaterina Doubrovina(Pediatrics and Genetics), Banu Oflaz-Sozmen(Pediatrics and Genetics), Susan E. Prockop(Pediatrics and Genetics), Nancy A. Kernan(Pediatrics and Genetics), Sara Abramson(University Radiology), Julie Teruya‐Feldstein, Cyrus V. Hedvat, Joanne F. Chou(Cancer Research And Biostatistics), Glenn Heller(Cancer Research And Biostatistics), Juliet N. Barker(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Farid Boulad(Pediatrics and Genetics), Hugo Castro‐Malaspina(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Diane George(Pediatrics and Genetics), Ann A. Jakubowski(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Guenther Koehne(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Esperanza B. Papadopoulos(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Andromachi Scaradavou(Pediatrics and Genetics), Trudy N. Small(Pediatrics and Genetics), Ramzi Khalaf(Pediatrics and Genetics), James W. Young(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Richard J. O’Reilly(Pediatrics and Genetics)
Blood
December 3, 2011
Cited by 420Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

We evaluated HLA-compatible donor leukocyte infusions (DLIs) and HLA-compatible or HLA-disparate EBV-specific T cells (EBV-CTLs) in 49 hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients with biopsy-proven EBV-lymphoproliferative disease (EBV-LPD). DLIs and EBV-CTLs each induced durable complete or partial remissions in 73% and 68% of treated patients including 74% and 72% of patients surviving ≥ 8 days after infusion, respectively. Reversible acute GVHD occurred in recipients of DLIs (17%) but not EBV-CTLs. The probability of complete response was significantly lower among patients with multiorgan involvement. In responders, DLIs and EBV-CTLs regularly induced exponential increases in EBV-specific CTL precursor (EBV-CTLp) frequencies within 7-14 days, with subsequent clearance of EBV viremia and resolution of disease. In nonresponders, EBV-CTLps did not increase and EBV viremia persisted. Treatment failures were correlated with impaired T-cell recognition of tumor targets. Either donor-derived EBV-CTLs that had been sensitized with autologous BLCLs transformed by EBV strain B95.8 could not lyse spontaneous donor-derived EBV-transformed BLCLs expanded from the patient's blood or biopsied tumor or they failed to lyse their targets because they were selectively restricted by HLA alleles not shared by the EBV-LPD. Therefore, either unselected DLIs or EBV-specific CTLs can eradicate both untreated and Rituxan-resistant lymphomatous EBV-LPD, with failures ascribable to impaired T-cell recognition of tumor-associated viral antigens or their presenting HLA alleles.


Related Papers