Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

Maurizio Cecconi(St George's Hospital), Daniel De Backer(Université Libre de Bruxelles), Massimo Antonelli(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Richard Beale(Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust), Jan Bakker(Erasmus MC), Christoph K. Hofer(Triemli Hospital), Roman Jaeschke(McMaster University), Alexandre Mebazaa(Inserm), Michael R. Pinsky(University of Pittsburgh), Jean–Louis Teboul(Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris), Jean‐Louis Vincent(Université Libre de Bruxelles), Andrew Rhodes(St George's Hospital)
Intensive Care Medicine
November 13, 2014
Cited by 1,757Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Circulatory shock is a life-threatening syndrome resulting in multiorgan failure and a high mortality rate. The aim of this consensus is to provide support to the bedside clinician regarding the diagnosis, management and monitoring of shock. METHODS: The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine invited 12 experts to form a Task Force to update a previous consensus (Antonelli et al.: Intensive Care Med 33:575-590, 2007). The same five questions addressed in the earlier consensus were used as the outline for the literature search and review, with the aim of the Task Force to produce statements based on the available literature and evidence. These questions were: (1) What are the epidemiologic and pathophysiologic features of shock in the intensive care unit? (2) Should we monitor preload and fluid responsiveness in shock? (3) How and when should we monitor stroke volume or cardiac output in shock? (4) What markers of the regional and microcirculation can be monitored, and how can cellular function be assessed in shock? (5) What is the evidence for using hemodynamic monitoring to direct therapy in shock? Four types of statements were used: definition, recommendation, best practice and statement of fact. RESULTS: Forty-four statements were made. The main new statements include: (1) statements on individualizing blood pressure targets; (2) statements on the assessment and prediction of fluid responsiveness; (3) statements on the use of echocardiography and hemodynamic monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus provides 44 statements that can be used at the bedside to diagnose, treat and monitor patients with shock.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis