Extracorporeal albumin dialysis with the molecular adsorbent recirculating system in acute-on-chronic liver failure: The RELIEF trial

Rafael Bañares(Universidad Complutense de Madrid), Frederik Nevens(KU Leuven), Fin Stolze Larsen(Rigshospitalet), Rajiv Jalan(The Royal Free Hospital), Agustı́n Albillos(Universidad de Alcalá), Matthias Dollinger(Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg), Faouzi Saliba(Université Paris-Sud), Tilman Sauerbruch(University of Bonn), Sebastian Klammt(University of Rostock), Johann Ockenga(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Albert Parés(Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Julia Wendon(King's College Hospital), Tanja Brünnler(Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder), Ludwig Kramer(Klinik Hietzing), Philippe Mathurin(Hôpital Claude Huriez), Manuel de la Mata(Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba), Antonio Gasbarrini(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Beat Müllhaupt(University of Zurich), Alexander Wilmer(KU Leuven), Wim Laleman(KU Leuven), Martin Eefsen(Rigshospitalet), Sambit Sen(The Royal Free Hospital), Alexander Zipprich(Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg), Teresa Tenorio(Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria), Marco Pavesi, Hartmut Schmidt(Klinik und Poliklinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin), Steffen Mitzner(University of Rostock), Roger Williams(Foundation for Liver Research), Vicente Arroyo(Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas)
Hepatology
December 5, 2012
Cited by 560Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a frequent cause of death in cirrhosis. Albumin dialysis with the molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) decreases retained substances and improves hemodynamics and hepatic encephalopathy (HE). However, its survival impact is unknown. In all, 189 patients with ACLF were randomized either to MARS (n=95) or to standard therapy (SMT) (n=94). Ten patients (five per group) were excluded due to protocol violations. In addition, 23 patients (MARS: 19; SMT: 4) were excluded from per-protocol (PP) analysis (PP population n=156). Up to 10 6-8-hour MARS sessions were scheduled. The main endpoint was 28-day ITT and PP survival. There were no significant differences at inclusion, although the proportion of patients with Model for Endstage Liver Disease (MELD) score over 20 points and with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) as a precipitating event was almost significantly greater in the MARS group. The 28-day survival was similar in the two groups in the ITT and PP populations (60.7% versus 58.9%; 60% versus 59.2% respectively). After adjusting for confounders, a significant beneficial effect of MARS on survival was not observed (odds ratio [OR]: 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-1.72). MELD score and HE at admission and the increase in serum bilirubin at day 4 were independent predictors of death. At day 4, a greater decrease in serum creatinine (P=0.02) and bilirubin (P=0.001) and a more frequent improvement in HE (from grade II-IV to grade 0-I; 62.5% versus 38.2%; P=0.07) was observed in the MARS group. Severe adverse events were similar. CONCLUSION: At scheduled doses, a beneficial effect on survival of MARS therapy in patients with ACLF could not be demonstrated. However, MARS has an acceptable safety profile, has significant dialysis effect, and nonsignificantly improves severe HE.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis