Stomatal vs. genome size in angiosperms: the somatic tail wagging the genomic dog?

John Hodgson, M. Sharafi(University of Mazandaran), Adel Jalili(Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands), Sandra Dı́az(Universidad Nacional de Córdoba), Gabriel Montserrat‐Martí(Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología), Carol Palmer(University of Sheffield), Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini(University of Insubria), Simon Pierce(University of Insubria), Behnam Hamzeh’ee(Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands), Younes Asri(Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands), Ziba Jamzad(Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands), Peter Wilson(University of Sheffield), John A. Raven(University of Dundee), S. R. Band(University of Sheffield), Sandra Basconcelo(Universidad Nacional de Córdoba), A. Bogard(University of Sheffield), G. Carter(University of Sheffield), Michael Charles(University of Sheffield), Pilar Castro‐Díez(Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología), J. H. C. Cornelissen(Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam), Guillermo Funes(Universidad Nacional de Córdoba), Glynis Jones(University of Sheffield), Mostafa Khoshnevis(Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands), Natalia Pérez Harguindeguy(Universidad Nacional de Córdoba), Carmen Pérez‐Rontomé(Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología), A. Shirvany(Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands), Fernanda Vendramini(Universidad Nacional de Córdoba), S. Yazdani(Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands), R. Abbas‐Azimi(Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands), S. Boustani(Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands), Mehdi Dehghan(Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands), J. Guerrero‐Campo(Universidad Nacional de Córdoba), A. Hynd(University of Sheffield), E. Kowsary(Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands), F. Kazemi‐Saeed(Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands), Bita Siavash(Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands), Pedro Villar‐Salvador(Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología), Robert Craigie(University of Sheffield), Alireza Naqinezhad(University of Mazandaran), A. Romo‐Díez(Institut Botànic de Barcelona), Lluís de Torres Espuny(Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología), Ellen Simmons(University of Sheffield)
Annals of Botany
April 1, 2010
Cited by 150Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Genome size is a function, and the product, of cell volume. As such it is contingent on ecological circumstance. The nature of 'this ecological circumstance' is, however, hotly debated. Here, we investigate for angiosperms whether stomatal size may be this 'missing link': the primary determinant of genome size. Stomata are crucial for photosynthesis and their size affects functional efficiency. METHODS: Stomatal and leaf characteristics were measured for 1442 species from Argentina, Iran, Spain and the UK and, using PCA, some emergent ecological and taxonomic patterns identified. Subsequently, an assessment of the relationship between genome-size values obtained from the Plant DNA C-values database and measurements of stomatal size was carried out. KEY RESULTS: Stomatal size is an ecologically important attribute. It varies with life-history (woody species < herbaceous species < vernal geophytes) and contributes to ecologically and physiologically important axes of leaf specialization. Moreover, it is positively correlated with genome size across a wide range of major taxa. CONCLUSIONS: Stomatal size predicts genome size within angiosperms. Correlation is not, however, proof of causality and here our interpretation is hampered by unexpected deficiencies in the scientific literature. Firstly, there are discrepancies between our own observations and established ideas about the ecological significance of stomatal size; very large stomata, theoretically facilitating photosynthesis in deep shade, were, in this study (and in other studies), primarily associated with vernal geophytes of unshaded habitats. Secondly, the lower size limit at which stomata can function efficiently, and the ecological circumstances under which these minute stomata might occur, have not been satisfactorally resolved. Thus, our hypothesis, that the optimization of stomatal size for functional efficiency is a major ecological determinant of genome size, remains unproven.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis