The Role of Surgery in the Management of Recurrent Adrenocortical Carcinoma

Ilknur Erdogan(Diabetes Australia), Timo Deutschbein(Diabetes Australia), Christian Jurowich, Matthias Kroiß(Diabetes Australia), Christina Ronchi(Diabetes Australia), Marcus Quinkler(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Jens Waldmann(Philipps University of Marburg), Holger S. Willenberg(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Felix Beuschlein(LMU Klinikum), Christian Fottner(Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz), Silke Klose(University Hospital Magdeburg), Anke Heidemeier(Universitätsklinikum Würzburg), David Brix(Universitätsklinikum Würzburg), Wiebke Fenske(Diabetes Australia), Stefanie Hahner(Diabetes Australia), J. Reibetanz, Bruno Allolio(Diabetes Australia), Martin Faßnacht(Diabetes Australia)
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
November 14, 2012
Cited by 154Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

CONTEXT: Surgery is the standard of care for localized adrenocortical carcinomas, but its role for recurrent disease is not well defined. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate clinical outcome after surgery for recurrence. DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective analysis in 154 patients with first recurrence after initial radical resection from the German Adrenocortical Carcinoma Registry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by Kaplan-Meier method and identified prognostic factors by Cox regression analysis. RESULT: A total of 101 patients underwent repeated surgery (radical resection, n = 78), and 99 received (additional) nonsurgical therapy. After a median of 6 (1-221) months, 144 patients (94%) experienced progression. Multivariate analysis adjusted for age, sex, tumor burden, time to first recurrence (TTFR), surgery for recurrence (including resection status), and additional therapy indicated that only two factors were significantly associated with shorter PFS [hazard ratio for progression: for TTFR ≤ 12 months, 1.8 (95% confidence interval = 1.3-2.6) vs. TTFR > 12 months; for macroscopically incomplete resection, 3.4 (1.5-7.9), and for no surgery, 3.4 (1.6-7.0) vs. microscopically complete (R0)-resection and OS [hazard ratio for death: for TTFR > 12 months, 3.1 (2.0-4.7) vs. TTFR ≤ 12 months; for macroscopically incomplete resection, 2.7 (1.1-6.9), and no surgery, 4.2 (1.8-9.6) vs. R0-resection]. Patients who had both TTFR over 12 months and R0-resection of recurrent tumors (n = 22) had the best prognosis (median PFS, 24 months; median OS, >60 months). CONCLUSIONS: The best predictors of prolonged survival after first recurrence are TTFR over 12 months and R0-resection. Our data suggest that patients with longer TTFR and tumors amenable to radical resection should be operated, whereas individualized treatment decisions are needed for patients with short TTFR or with not completely resectable tumors.


Related Papers