Fecal Indicators in Sand, Sand Contact, and Risk of Enteric Illness Among Beachgoers

Christopher D. Heaney(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Elizabeth Sams(Environmental Protection Agency), Alfred Dufour(Environmental Protection Agency), Kristen P. Brenner(Environmental Protection Agency), Richard A. Haugland(Johns Hopkins University), Eunice C. Chern(Environmental Protection Agency), Steve Wing(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Stephen W. Marshall(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), David C. Love(Johns Hopkins University), Marc L. Serre(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Rachel T. Noble(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Timothy J. Wade(Environmental Protection Agency)
Epidemiology
December 13, 2011
Cited by 124Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Beach sand can harbor fecal indicator organisms and pathogens, but enteric illness risk associated with sand contact remains unclear. METHODS: In 2007, visitors at 2 recreational marine beaches were asked on the day of their visit about sand contact. Ten to 12 days later, participants answered questions about health symptoms since the visit. F+ coliphage, Enterococcus, Bacteroidales, fecal Bacteroides, and Clostridium spp. in wet sand were measured using culture and molecular methods. RESULTS: We analyzed 144 wet sand samples and completed 4999 interviews. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were computed, comparing those in the highest tertile of fecal indicator exposure with those who reported no sand contact. Among those digging in sand compared with those not digging in sand, a molecular measure of Enterococcus spp. (calibrator cell equivalents/g) in sand was positively associated with gastrointestinal (GI) illness (aOR = 2.0 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2-3.2]) and diarrhea (2.4 [1.4-4.2]). Among those buried in sand, point estimates were greater for GI illness (3.3 [1.3-7.9]) and diarrhea (4.9 [1.8-13]). Positive associations were also observed for culture-based Enterococcus (colony-forming units/g) with GI illness (aOR digging = 1.7 [1.1-2.7]) and diarrhea (2.1 [1.3-3.4]). Associations were not found among nonswimmers with sand exposure. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a positive relationship between sand-contact activities and enteric illness as a function of concentrations of fecal microbial pollution in beach sand.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis