An evaluation of the performance of chemistry transport models by comparison with research aircraft observations. Part 1: Concepts and overall model performance
Dominik Brunner(Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology), R. Sausen(Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR)), E. Mancini(University of L'Aquila), J. A. Pyle(Oak Ridge National Laboratory), Michael Gauss(Norwegian Meteorological Institute), Didier Hauglustaine(Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives), J. Staehelin(ETH Zurich), Marcus O. Köhler(University of Cambridge), Giovanni Pitari(University of L'Aquila), L. Jourdain, P. van Velthoven(Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute), E. Meijer(Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute), Volker Grewe(Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR)), Terje K. Berntsen(University of Oslo), H. L. Rogers(University of Cambridge), I. S. A. Isaksen(University of Oslo)
Cited by 75
Related Papers
Contribution of anthropogenic and natural sources to atmospheric methane variability
|Nature|2006|1.1k
Very Strong Atmospheric Methane Growth in the 4 Years 2014–2017: Implications for the Paris Agreement
|Global Biogeochemical Cycles|2019|789
Measurement of ozone and water vapor by Airbus in‐service aircraft: The MOZAIC airborne program, an overview
|Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres|1998|653
Radiative forcing in the 21st century due to ozone changes in the troposphere and the lower stratosphere
|Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres|2003|569
Rising atmospheric methane: 2007–2014 growth and isotopic shift
|Global Biogeochemical Cycles|2016|559