<i>MGMT</i> Promoter Methylation Is a Strong Prognostic Biomarker for Benefit from Dose-Intensified Temozolomide Rechallenge in Progressive Glioblastoma: The DIRECTOR Trial

Michael Weller(University of Zurich), Ghazaleh Tabatabai(University of Zurich), Bärbel Kästner(Heidelberg University), Jörg Felsberg(German Cancer Research Center), Joachim P. Steinbach(Goethe University Frankfurt), Antje Wick(German Cancer Research Center), Oliver Schnell(Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München), Peter Hau(University Hospital Regensburg), Ulrich Herrlinger(University of Bonn), Michael Sabel(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Hans‐Georg Wirsching(University of Zurich), Ralf Ketter(Saarland University), Oliver Bähr(Goethe University Frankfurt), Michael Platten(German Cancer Research Center), Jörg C. Tonn(Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München), Uwe Schlegel(University Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum), Christine Marosi(Medical University of Vienna), Roland Goldbrunner(University Hospital Cologne), Roger Stupp(University Hospital of Lausanne), Krisztián Homicskó(University Hospital of Lausanne), Josef Pichler(Women's General Hospital), Guido Nikkhah(University Medical Center Freiburg), Jürgen Meixensberger(University Hospital Leipzig), Peter Vajkoczy(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Spyros Kollias(University Hospital of Zurich), Johannes Hüsing(Heidelberg University), Guido Reifenberger(German Cancer Research Center), Wolfgang Wick(German Cancer Research Center)
Clinical Cancer Research
February 6, 2015
Cited by 316Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: Rechallenge with temozolomide (TMZ) at first progression of glioblastoma after temozolomide chemoradiotherapy (TMZ/RT→TMZ) has been studied in retrospective and single-arm prospective studies, applying temozolomide continuously or using 7/14 or 21/28 days schedules. The DIRECTOR trial sought to show superiority of the 7/14 regimen. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with glioblastoma at first progression after TMZ/RT→TMZ and at least two maintenance temozolomide cycles were randomized to Arm A [one week on (120 mg/m(2) per day)/one week off] or Arm B [3 weeks on (80 mg/m(2) per day)/one week off]. The primary endpoint was median time-to-treatment failure (TTF) defined as progression, premature temozolomide discontinuation for toxicity, or death from any cause. O(6)-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation was prospectively assessed by methylation-specific PCR. RESULTS: Because of withdrawal of support, the trial was prematurely closed to accrual after 105 patients. There was a similar outcome in both arms for median TTF [A: 1.8 months; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.8-3.2 vs. B: 2.0 months; 95% CI, 1.8-3.5] and overall survival [A: 9.8 months (95% CI, 6.7-13.0) vs. B: 10.6 months (95% CI, 8.1-11.6)]. Median TTF in patients with MGMT-methylated tumors was 3.2 months (95% CI, 1.8-7.4) versus 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.8-2) in MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma. Progression-free survival rates at 6 months (PFS-6) were 39.7% with versus 6.9% without MGMT promoter methylation. CONCLUSIONS: Temozolomide rechallenge is a treatment option for MGMT promoter-methylated recurrent glioblastoma. Alternative strategies need to be considered for patients with progressive glioblastoma without MGMT promoter methylation.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis