Three distinct subgroups of hypodiploidy in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Christine J. Harrison(Blood Cancer UK), Anthony V. Moorman(Blood Cancer UK), Zoë J. Broadfield(Blood Cancer UK), Kan Luk Cheung(Blood Cancer UK), Rachel L. Harris(Blood Cancer UK), G. Reza Jalali(Blood Cancer UK), Hazel M. Robinson(Blood Cancer UK), Kerry E. Barber(Blood Cancer UK), Sue Richards, Christopher Mitchell(John Radcliffe Hospital), Tim Eden(The Christie Hospital), Ian Hann(Great Ormond Street Hospital), Frank G. H. Hill(Children's of Alabama), Sally E. Kinsey(St James's University Hospital), Brenda Gibson(Royal Hospital for Children), John Lilleyman(Royal London Hospital), Ajay Vora(Sheffield Children's Hospital), Anthony H. Goldstone(University College Hospital), Ian M. Franklin(Glasgow Royal Infirmary), Jill Durrant, Mary Martineau(Blood Cancer UK), Childhood and Adult Leukaemia Working Parties(Blood Cancer UK)
British Journal of Haematology
April 19, 2004
Cited by 233Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

This study of children and adults with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) is the largest series of patients with hypodiploidy (<46 chromosomes) yet reported. The incidence of 5% was independent of age. Patients were subdivided by the number of chromosomes; near-haploidy (23-29 chromosomes), low hypodiploidy (33-39 chromosomes) and high hypodiploidy (42-45 chromosomes). The near-haploid and low hypodiploid groups were characterized by their chromosomal gains and a doubled hyperdiploid population. Structural abnormalities were more frequent in the low hypodiploid group. Near-haploidy was restricted to children of median age 7 years (range 2-15) whereas low hypodiploidy occurred in an older group of median age 15 years (range 9-54). Patients with 42-45 chromosomes were characterized by complex karyotypes involving chromosomes 7, 9 and 12. The features shared by the few patients with 42-44 chromosomes and the large number with 45 justified their inclusion in the same group. Survival analysis showed a poor outcome for the near-haploid and low hypodiploid groups compared to those with 42-45 chromosomes. Thus cytogenetics, or at least a clear definition of the modal chromosome number, is essential at diagnosis in order to stratify patients with hypodiploidy into the appropriate risk group for treatment.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis