The cosmic code comparison project

Katrin Heitmann(Los Alamos National Laboratory), Zarija Lukić(University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign), Patricia Fasel(Los Alamos National Laboratory), Salman Habib(Los Alamos National Laboratory), Michael S. Warren(Los Alamos National Laboratory), Martin White(University of California, Berkeley), James Ahrens(Los Alamos National Laboratory), L.A. Ankeny(Los Alamos National Laboratory), Ryan Armstrong(University of California, Davis), Brian W. O’Shea(Los Alamos National Laboratory), P. M. Ricker(National Center for Supercomputing Applications), Volker Springel(Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics), Joachim Stadel(University of Zurich), Hy Trac(Princeton University)
Computational Science & Discovery
November 20, 2008
Cited by 128Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Current and upcoming cosmological observations allow us to probe structures on smaller and smaller scales, entering highly nonlinear regimes. In order to obtain theoretical predictions in these regimes, large cosmological simulations have to be carried out. The promised high accuracy from observations makes the simulation task very demanding: the simulations have to be at least as accurate as the observations. This requirement can only be fulfilled by carrying out an extensive code verification program. The first step of such a program is the comparison of different cosmology codes including gravitational interactions only. In this paper, we extend a recently carried out code comparison project to include five more simulation codes. We restrict our analysis to a small cosmological volume which allows us to investigate properties of halos. For the matter power spectrum and the mass function, the previous results hold, with the codes agreeing at the 10% level over wide dynamic ranges. We extend our analysis to the comparison of halo profiles and investigate the halo count as a function of local density. We introduce and discuss ParaView as a flexible analysis tool for cosmological simulations, the use of which immensely simplifies the code comparison task.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis