Composition of Wide Bandgap Semiconductor Materials and Nanostructures Measured by Atom Probe Tomography and Its Dependence on the Surface Electric Field

Lorenzo Mancini(Groupe de Physique des Matériaux), Nooshin Amirifar(Groupe de Physique des Matériaux), Deodatta Shinde(Groupe de Physique des Matériaux), Ivan Blum(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Matthieu Gilbert(Groupe de Physique des Matériaux), Angela Vella(Groupe de Physique des Matériaux), F. Vurpillot(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Williams Lefebvre(Normandie Université), R. Lardé(Groupe de Physique des Matériaux), Etienne Talbot(Groupe de Physique des Matériaux), P. Pareige(Normandie Université), X. Portier(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Ahmed Ziani(Centre de Recherche sur les Ions, les Matériaux et la Photonique), Christian Davesnne(Université de Caen Normandie), Christophe Durand(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), J. Eymery(Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives), R. Butté(École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne), J.‐F. Carlin(École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne), N. Grandjean(École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne), Lorenzo Rigutti(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
September 19, 2014
Cited by 165Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Atom probe tomography allows for three-dimensional reconstruction of the elemental distribution in materials at the nanoscale. However, the measurement of the chemical composition of compound semiconductors may exhibit strong biases depending on the experimental parameters used. This article reports on a systematic analysis of the composition measurement of III–N binary (AlN, GaN) and ternary compounds (InGaN, InAlN), MgO, and ZnO by laser-assisted tomographic atom probe as a function of laser power and applied DC bias. We performed separate series of measurements at constant bias, constant laser pulse energy, and constant detection rate and a spatial analysis of the surface field through detector hitmap ratios of elemental charge states. As a result, (i) we can determine the separate roles of laser energy and surface field—the latter being the dominant factor under standard conditions of analysis; (ii) we compare the behavior of different samples and (iii) different materials; and (iv) we critically discuss the reliability of the measurement of InxGa1–xN and InxAl1–xN alloy fractions and of the Tb concentration in rare-earth-doped ZnO.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis