Clinical performance of the Nevisense system in cutaneous melanoma detection: an international, multicentre, prospective and blinded clinical trial on efficacy and safety

Josep Malvehy(Hospital Clínic de Barcelona), Axel Hauschild(Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel), Clara Curiel‐Lewandrowski(University of Arizona), Peter Mohr(Elbe Kliniken Stade-Buxtehude), Rainer Hofmann‐Wellenhof(University of Graz), Richard Motley(University Hospital of Wales), Carola Berking(Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München), Douglas Grossman(University of Utah), J. Paoli(Sahlgrenska University Hospital), Carmen Loquai(Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz), Judit Oláh(University of Szeged), Uwe Reinhold, H Wenger(Ryhov Hospital Jönköping), Thomas Dirschka(Praxis), Suraj Davis(Dermatology Clinical Research Center of San Antonio), C. A. Henderson(University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust), Harold Rabinovitz(Skin Cancer Foundation), Julia Welzel(University Hospital Augsburg), Dirk Schadendorf(University of Duisburg-Essen), Ulrik Birgersson(Karolinska Institutet)
British Journal of Dermatology
May 19, 2014
Cited by 202Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Even though progress has been made, the detection of melanoma still poses a challenge. In light of this situation, the Nevisense electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) system (SciBase AB, Stockholm, Sweden) was designed and shown to have the potential to be used as an adjunct diagnostic tool for melanoma detection. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of the Nevisense system in the distinction of benign lesions of the skin from melanoma with electrical impedance spectroscopy. METHODS: This multicentre, prospective, and blinded clinical study was conducted at five American and 17 European investigational sites. All eligible skin lesions in the study were examined with the EIS-based Nevisense system, photographed, removed by excisional biopsy and subjected to histopathological evaluation. A postprocedure clinical follow-up was conducted at 7 ± 3 days from the initial measurement. A total of 1951 patients with 2416 lesions were enrolled into the study; 1943 lesions were eligible and evaluable for the primary efficacy end point, including 265 melanomas - 112 in situ and 153 invasive melanomas with a median Breslow thickness of 0·57 mm [48 basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) and seven squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs)]. RESULTS: The observed sensitivity of Nevisense was 96·6% (256 of 265 melanomas) with an exact one-sided 95% lower confidence bound estimated at 94·2% and an observed specificity of 34·4%, and an exact two-sided 95% confidence bound estimated at 32·0-36·9%. The positive and negative predictive values of Nevisense were 21·1% and 98·2%, respectively. The observed sensitivity for nonmelanoma skin cancer was 100% (55 of 48 BCCs and seven SCCs) with an exact two-sided 95% confidence bound estimated at 93·5-100·0%. CONCLUSIONS: Nevisense is an accurate and safe device to support clinicians in the detection of cutaneous melanoma.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis