Tofacitinib (CP‐690,550) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving methotrexate: Twelve‐month data from a twenty‐four–month phase III randomized radiographic study

Désirée van der Heijde(Leiden University Medical Center), Yoshiya Tanaka(University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan), Roy Fleischmann(Metroplex Clinical Research Center), Edward Keystone(University of Toronto), Joel M. Kremer(Albany Medical Center Hospital), Cristiano A. F. Zerbini(Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica), Myrna Cardiel(Universidad de Morelia), Stanley Cohen(Metroplex Clinical Research Center), Peter Nash(The University of Queensland), Yeong Wook Song(Seoul National University Hospital), Dana Tegzová(Institute of Rheumatology), Bradley T. Wyman(Pfizer (United States)), David Gruben(Pfizer (United States)), Birgitta Benda(Pfizer (United States)), Gene V. Wallenstein(Pfizer (United States)), Sriram Krishnaswami(Pfizer (United States)), Samuel H. Zwillich(Pfizer (United States)), John Bradley(Pfizer (United States)), Carol A. Connell(Pfizer (United States)), and the ORAL Scan Investigators
Arthritis & Rheumatism
January 24, 2013
Cited by 581

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this 24-month phase III study was to examine structural preservation with tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). Data from a planned 12-month interim analysis are reported. METHODS: In this double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study, patients receiving background MTX were randomized 4:4:1:1 to tofacitinib at 5 mg twice daily, tofacitinib at 10 mg twice daily, placebo to tofacitinib at 5 mg twice daily, and placebo to tofacitinib at 10 mg twice daily. At month 3, nonresponder placebo-treated patients were advanced in a blinded manner to receive tofacitinib as indicated above; remaining placebo-treated patients were advanced at 6 months. Four primary efficacy end points were all analyzed in a step-down procedure. RESULTS: At month 6, response rates according to the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria for tofacitinib at 5 mg and 10 mg twice daily were higher than those for placebo (51.5% and 61.8%, respectively, versus 25.3%; both P < 0.0001). At month 6, least squares mean (LSM) changes in total modified Sharp/van der Heijde score for tofacitinib at 5 mg and 10 mg twice daily were 0.12 and 0.06, respectively, versus 0.47 for placebo (P = 0.0792 and P ≤ 0.05, respectively). At month 3, LSM changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index score for tofacitinib at 5 mg and 10 mg twice daily were -0.40 (significance not declared due to step-down procedure) and -0.54 (P < 0.0001), respectively, versus -0.15 for placebo. At month 6, rates of remission (defined as a value <2.6 for the 4-variable Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate) for tofacitinib at 5 mg and 10 mg twice daily were 7.2% (significance not declared due to step-down procedure) and 16.0% (P < 0.0001), respectively, versus 1.6% for placebo. The safety profile was consistent with findings in previous studies. CONCLUSION: Data from this 12-month interim analysis demonstrate that tofacitinib inhibits progression of structural damage and improves disease activity in patients with RA who are receiving MTX.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis