Everolimus Plus Exemestane in Postmenopausal Patients with HR+ Breast Cancer: BOLERO-2 Final Progression-Free Survival Analysis

Denise A. Yardley(Sarah Cannon Research Institute), Shinzaburo Noguchi(The University of Osaka), Kathleen I. Pritchard(Sunnybrook Health Science Centre), Howard A. Burris(Sarah Cannon Research Institute), José Baselga(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Michael Gnant(Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna), Gabriel N. Hortobágyi(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Mario Campone(Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest), Barbara Pistilli(Ospedale di Macerata), Martine Piccart(Université Libre de Bruxelles), Bohuslav Melichar(Palacký University Olomouc), Katarína Petráková(Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute), Francis P. Arena(NYU Langone Health), Frans Erdkamp(Zuyderland Medisch Centrum), Wael A. Harb(Horizon Oncology Center), Wentao Feng(Novartis (Switzerland)), Ayelet Cahana(Novartis (Switzerland)), Tetiana Taran(Novartis (Switzerland)), David Lebwohl(Novartis (Switzerland)), Hope S. Rugo(University of California, San Francisco)
Advances in Therapy
October 1, 2013
Cited by 519Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Effective treatments for hormone-receptor-positive (HR(+)) breast cancer (BC) following relapse/progression on nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) therapy are needed. Initial Breast Cancer Trials of OraL EveROlimus-2 (BOLERO-2) trial data demonstrated that everolimus and exemestane significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo plus exemestane alone in this patient population. METHODS: BOLERO-2 is a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, international trial comparing everolimus (10 mg/day) plus exemestane (25 mg/day) versus placebo plus exemestane in postmenopausal women with HR(+) advanced BC with recurrence/progression during or after NSAIs. The primary endpoint was PFS by local investigator review, and was confirmed by independent central radiology review. Overall survival, response rate, and clinical benefit rate were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Final study results with median 18-month follow-up show that median PFS remained significantly longer with everolimus plus exemestane versus placebo plus exemestane [investigator review: 7.8 versus 3.2 months, respectively; hazard ratio = 0.45 (95% confidence interval 0.38-0.54); log-rank P < 0.0001; central review: 11.0 versus 4.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio = 0.38 (95% confidence interval 0.31-0.48); log-rank P < 0.0001] in the overall population and in all prospectively defined subgroups, including patients with visceral metastases, [corrected] and irrespective of age. The incidence and severity of adverse events were consistent with those reported at the interim analysis and in other everolimus trials. CONCLUSION: The addition of everolimus to exemestane markedly prolonged PFS in patients with HR(+) advanced BC with disease recurrence/progression following prior NSAIs. These results further support the use of everolimus plus exemestane in this patient population. ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT00863655.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis