Rheumatoid arthritis is a heterogeneous disease: Evidence for differences in the activation of the STAT‐1 pathway between rheumatoid tissues

Tineke C. T. M. van der Pouw Kraan(Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam), F. van Gaalen(Leiden University Medical Center), Pia V. Kasperkovitz(Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam), Nicolette L. Verbeet(Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam), Tom Smeets(Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam), Maarten C. Kraan(Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam), Mike Fero(Stanford University), Paul‐Peter Tak(Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam), T. Huizinga(Leiden University Medical Center), Elsbet Pieterman(Leiden University Medical Center), Ferdinand C. Breedveld(Leiden University Medical Center), Ash A. Alizadeh(Stanford University), Cornelis L. Verweij(Leiden University Medical Center)
Arthritis & Rheumatism
August 1, 2003
Cited by 262Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To generate a molecular description of synovial tissue from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients that would allow us to unravel novel aspects of pathogenesis and to identify different forms of disease. METHODS: We applied complementary DNA microarray analysis to profile gene expression, with a focus on immune-related genes, in affected joint tissues from RA patients and in tissues from osteoarthritis (OA) patients as a control. To validate microarray data, real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed on genes of interest. RESULTS: The gene expression signatures of synovial tissues from RA patients showed considerable variability, resulting in the identification of at least two molecularly distinct forms of RA tissues. One class of tissues revealed abundant expression of clusters of genes indicative of an involvement of the adaptive immune response. Detailed analysis of the expression profile provided evidence for a prominent role of an activated signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 pathway in these tissues. The expression profiles of another group of RA tissues revealed an increased tissue remodeling activity and a low inflammatory gene expression signature. The gene expression pattern in the latter tissues was reminiscent of that observed in the majority of OA tissues. CONCLUSION: The differences in the gene expression profiles provide a unique perspective for distinguishing different pathogenetic RA subsets based on molecular criteria. These data reflect important aspects of molecular variation that are relevant for understanding the biologic dysregulation underlying these subsets of RA. This approach may also help to define homogeneous groups for clinical studies and evaluation of targeted therapies.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis