Comparing Photosynthetic and Photovoltaic Efficiencies and Recognizing the Potential for Improvement

Robert E. Blankenship(Washington University in St. Louis), David M. Tiede(Argonne National Laboratory), James Barber(Politecnico di Torino), Gary W. Brudvig(Yale University), Graham R. Fleming(Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), Maria L. Ghirardi(National Laboratory of the Rockies), M. R. Gunner(City College of New York), Wolfgang Junge(Osnabrück University), David Kramer(Michigan State University), Anastasios Melis(University of California, Berkeley), Thomas A. Moore(Arizona State University), Christopher C. Moser(University of Pennsylvania), Daniel G. Nocera(Massachusetts Institute of Technology), Arthur J. Nozik(National Laboratory of the Rockies), Donald R. Ort(Urbana University), William W. Parson(University of Washington), Roger C. Prince(ExxonMobil (United States)), Richard T. Sayre(Donald Danforth Plant Science Center)
Science
May 12, 2011
Cited by 1,625Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Comparing photosynthetic and photovoltaic efficiencies is not a simple issue. Although both processes harvest the energy in sunlight, they operate in distinctly different ways and produce different types of products: biomass or chemical fuels in the case of natural photosynthesis and nonstored electrical current in the case of photovoltaics. In order to find common ground for evaluating energy-conversion efficiency, we compare natural photosynthesis with present technologies for photovoltaic-driven electrolysis of water to produce hydrogen. Photovoltaic-driven electrolysis is the more efficient process when measured on an annual basis, yet short-term yields for photosynthetic conversion under optimal conditions come within a factor of 2 or 3 of the photovoltaic benchmark. We consider opportunities in which the frontiers of synthetic biology might be used to enhance natural photosynthesis for improved solar energy conversion efficiency.


Related Papers