NeuPSIG guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment

Maija Haanpää(Invalidisäätiö), Nadine Attal(Hôpital Ambroise-Paré), Miroslav Bačkonja(University of Wisconsin–Madison), Ralf Baron(University of Lübeck), Mike Bennett(Lancaster University), Didier Bouhassira(Inserm), G. Cruccu(Sapienza University of Rome), Per Hansson(Karolinska University Hospital), Jennifer A. Haythornthwaite(Johns Hopkins University), Gian Domenico Iannetti(University College London), Troels S. Jensen(Danish Pain Research Center), Timo Kauppila(University of Helsinki), Turo Nurmikko(University of Liverpool), Andew S.C. Rice(Imperial College London), Michael C. Rowbotham(University of California, San Francisco), Jordi Serra(Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance (United States)), Claudia Sommer(University of Würzburg), Blair H. Smith(University of Aberdeen), Rolf‐Detlef Treede(Heidelberg University)
Pain
September 20, 2010
Cited by 1,034

Abstract

This is a revision of guidelines, originally published in 2004, for the assessment of patients with neuropathic pain. Neuropathic pain is defined as pain arising as a direct consequence of a lesion or disease affecting the somatosensory system either at peripheral or central level. Screening questionnaires are suitable for identifying potential patients with neuropathic pain, but further validation of them is needed for epidemiological purposes. Clinical examination, including accurate sensory examination, is the basis of neuropathic pain diagnosis. For more accurate sensory profiling, quantitative sensory testing is recommended for selected cases in clinic, including the diagnosis of small fiber neuropathies and for research purposes. Measurement of trigeminal reflexes mediated by A-beta fibers can be used to differentiate symptomatic trigeminal neuralgia from classical trigeminal neuralgia. Measurement of laser-evoked potentials is useful for assessing function of the A-delta fiber pathways in patients with neuropathic pain. Functional brain imaging is not currently useful for individual patients in clinical practice, but is an interesting research tool. Skin biopsy to measure the intraepidermal nerve fiber density should be performed in patients with clinical signs of small fiber dysfunction. The intensity of pain and treatment effect (both in clinic and trials) should be assessed with numerical rating scale or visual analog scale. For future neuropathic pain trials, pain relief scales, patient and clinician global impression of change, the proportion of responders (50% and 30% pain relief), validated neuropathic pain quality measures and assessment of sleep, mood, functional capacity and quality of life are recommended.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis