Protected Environments and Prophylactic Antibiotics

Arthur S. Levine(National Institutes of Health), Stuart E. Siegel(National Institutes of Health), Alan D. Schreiber(National Institutes of Health), Janet Hauser(National Institutes of Health), Harvey D. Preisler(National Institutes of Health), Ira M. Goldstein(National Institutes of Health), FLORENCE M. SEIDLER(National Institutes of Health), Richard Simon(National Institutes of Health), Seymour Perry(National Institutes of Health), John E. Bennett(National Institutes of Health), Edward S. Henderson(National Institutes of Health)
New England Journal of Medicine
March 8, 1973
Cited by 327

Abstract

To reduce the frequency of infection in acute leukemia, we employed isolation and air-filtration facilities ("protected environment") and a prophylactic regimen that included oral nonabsorbable antibiotics. Eighty-eight randomized patients received identical remission-induction chemotherapy within one of three groups: protected environment combined with the prophylactic regimen (Group 1); oral nonabsorbable antibiotics alone (Group 2); and neither isolation nor prophylaxis (Group 3). The groups were comparable in factors that might influence the course of leukemia and susceptibility to infection. Environmental maneuvers. were effective in reducing the potential inoculum of ambient micro-organisms. Patients in Group 1 had 1/2 as many severe infections as those in Groups 2 and 3. Whereas approximately 1/4 of the patients in Groups 2 and 3 died of infection while on study, none in Group 1 died for that reason. Despite fewer infections in Group 1, no intergroup differences were found in remission rate or duration. The ultimate benefits of reduced infectious morbidity in leukemia may depend on further advances in chemotherapy.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis