Why weight? Modelling sample and observational level variability improves power in RNA-seq analyses

Ruijie Liu(Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research), Aliaksei Z. Holik(Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research), Shian Su(Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research), Natasha Jansz(Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research), Kelan Chen(University of Melbourne), Huei San Leong(University of Melbourne), Marnie E. Blewitt(Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research), Marie-Liesse Asselin-Labat(Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research), Gordon K. Smyth(Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research), Matthew E. Ritchie(Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research)
Nucleic Acids Research
April 29, 2015
Cited by 635Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Variations in sample quality are frequently encountered in small RNA-sequencing experiments, and pose a major challenge in a differential expression analysis. Removal of high variation samples reduces noise, but at a cost of reducing power, thus limiting our ability to detect biologically meaningful changes. Similarly, retaining these samples in the analysis may not reveal any statistically significant changes due to the higher noise level. A compromise is to use all available data, but to down-weight the observations from more variable samples. We describe a statistical approach that facilitates this by modelling heterogeneity at both the sample and observational levels as part of the differential expression analysis. At the sample level this is achieved by fitting a log-linear variance model that includes common sample-specific or group-specific parameters that are shared between genes. The estimated sample variance factors are then converted to weights and combined with observational level weights obtained from the mean-variance relationship of the log-counts-per-million using 'voom'. A comprehensive analysis involving both simulations and experimental RNA-sequencing data demonstrates that this strategy leads to a universally more powerful analysis and fewer false discoveries when compared to conventional approaches. This methodology has wide application and is implemented in the open-source 'limma' package.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis