A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain

Damian Hoy(The University of Queensland), Christopher Bain(The University of Queensland), Gail Williams(The University of Queensland), Lyn March(The University of Sydney), Peter Brooks(The University of Melbourne), Fiona Blyth(The University of Sydney), Anthony D. Woolf(Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry), Theo Vos(The University of Queensland), Rachelle Buchbinder(Monash University)
Arthritis & Rheumatism
January 9, 2012
Cited by 2,989

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain, and to examine the influence that case definition, prevalence period, and other variables have on prevalence. METHODS: We conducted a new systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain that included general population studies published between 1980 and 2009. A total of 165 studies from 54 countries were identified. Of these, 64% had been published since the last comparable review. RESULTS: Low back pain was shown to be a major problem throughout the world, with the highest prevalence among female individuals and those aged 40-80 years. After adjusting for methodologic variation, the mean ± SEM point prevalence was estimated to be 11.9 ± 2.0%, and the 1-month prevalence was estimated to be 23.2 ± 2.9%. CONCLUSION: As the population ages, the global number of individuals with low back pain is likely to increase substantially over the coming decades. Investigators are encouraged to adopt recent recommendations for a standard definition of low back pain and to consult a recently developed tool for assessing the risk of bias of prevalence studies.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis