The Effect of Group Psychosocial Support on Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Pamela J. Goodwin(Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute), Molyn Leszcz, Marguerite Ennis(Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute), Jan Koopmans(University of Calgary), Leslie Vincent(Centre for Nursing Innovation), Helaine Guther(Regional Cancer Center), Elaine Drysdale(University of Alberta), Marilyn Hundleby(University of Ottawa), Harvey Max Chochinov(University of Manitoba), Margaret Navarro, Michael Speca(University of Calgary), Julia Masterson, Liz Dohan, Rami A. Sela, Barbara H. Warren, Alexander Paterson, Kathleen I. Pritchard, Andrew Arnold, Richard Doll, Susan E. O’Reilly, Gail Quirt, Nicky Hood, Jonathan Hunter
New England Journal of Medicine
December 13, 2001
Cited by 892Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Supportive-expressive group therapy has been reported to prolong survival among women with metastatic breast cancer. However, in recent studies, various psychosocial interventions have not prolonged survival. METHODS: In a multicenter trial, we randomly assigned 235 women with metastatic breast cancer who were expected to survive at least three months in a 2:1 ratio to an intervention group that participated in weekly supportive-expressive group therapy (158 women) or to a control group that received no such intervention (77 women). All the women received educational materials and any medical or psychosocial care that was deemed necessary. The primary outcome was survival; psychosocial function was assessed by self-reported questionnaires. RESULTS: Women assigned to supportive-expressive therapy had greater improvement in psychological symptoms and reported less pain (P=0.04) than women in the control group. A significant interaction of treatment-group assignment with base-line psychological score was found (P</=0.003 for the comparison of mood variables; P=0.04 for the comparison of pain); women who were more distressed benefited, whereas those who were less distressed did not. The psychological intervention did not prolong survival (median survival, 17.9 months in the intervention group and 17.6 months in the control group; hazard ratio for death according to the univariate analysis, 1.06 [95 percent confidence interval, 0.78 to 1.45]; hazard ratio according to the multivariate analysis, 1.23 [95 percent confidence interval, 0.88 to 1.72]). CONCLUSIONS: Supportive-expressive group therapy does not prolong survival in women with metastatic breast cancer. It improves mood and the perception of pain, particularly in women who are initially more distressed.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis