Human gene therapy for RPE65 isomerase deficiency activates the retinoid cycle of vision but with slow rod kinetics

Artur V. Cideciyan(Penn Presbyterian Medical Center), Tomás S. Alemán(Penn Presbyterian Medical Center), Sanford L. Boye(University of Florida), Sharon Schwartz(Penn Presbyterian Medical Center), Shalesh Kaushal(University of Florida), Alejandro J. Román(Penn Presbyterian Medical Center), Jijing Pang(University of Florida), Alexander Sumaroka(Penn Presbyterian Medical Center), Elizabeth A. M. Windsor(Penn Presbyterian Medical Center), James M. Wilson(University of Pennsylvania), Terence R. Flotte(University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School), Gerald A. Fishman(University of Illinois Chicago), Elise Héon(University of Toronto), Edwin M. Stone(University of Iowa), Barry J. Byrne(University of Florida), Samuel G. Jacobson(Penn Presbyterian Medical Center), William W. Hauswirth(University of Florida)
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
September 23, 2008
Cited by 663Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

The RPE65 gene encodes the isomerase of the retinoid cycle, the enzymatic pathway that underlies mammalian vision. Mutations in RPE65 disrupt the retinoid cycle and cause a congenital human blindness known as Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA). We used adeno-associated virus-2-based RPE65 gene replacement therapy to treat three young adults with RPE65-LCA and measured their vision before and up to 90 days after the intervention. All three patients showed a statistically significant increase in visual sensitivity at 30 days after treatment localized to retinal areas that had received the vector. There were no changes in the effect between 30 and 90 days. Both cone- and rod-photoreceptor-based vision could be demonstrated in treated areas. For cones, there were increases of up to 1.7 log units (i.e., 50 fold); and for rods, there were gains of up to 4.8 log units (i.e., 63,000 fold). To assess what fraction of full vision potential was restored by gene therapy, we related the degree of light sensitivity to the level of remaining photoreceptors within the treatment area. We found that the intervention could overcome nearly all of the loss of light sensitivity resulting from the biochemical blockade. However, this reconstituted retinoid cycle was not completely normal. Resensitization kinetics of the newly treated rods were remarkably slow and required 8 h or more for the attainment of full sensitivity, compared with <1 h in normal eyes. Cone-sensitivity recovery time was rapid. These results demonstrate dramatic, albeit imperfect, recovery of rod- and cone-photoreceptor-based vision after RPE65 gene therapy.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis