Modelling of (2,1) NTM threshold in JET advanced scenarios
P. Maget(Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives), G. Huysmans(Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives), X. Litaudon(Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory), R. J. Buttery(Culham Centre for Fusion Energy), E. de la Luna, P. Buratti(National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development), J. Mailloux(Culham Centre for Fusion Energy), R. Coelho, C. Challis(Culham Centre for Fusion Energy), I. Jenkins(Culham Centre for Fusion Energy), H. Lütjens(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), M. Ottaviani(Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives), N. Hawkes(Culham Centre for Fusion Energy), M. Brix(Culham Centre for Fusion Energy), B. Alper(Culham Centre for Fusion Energy), C. Giroud(United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority)
Cited by 24
Related Papers
Active Control of Type-I Edge-Localized Modes with<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:math>Perturbation Fields in the JET Tokamak
|Physical Review Letters|2007|595
Chapter 6: Steady state operation
|Nuclear Fusion|2007|379
Pedestal stability comparison and ITER pedestal prediction
|Nuclear Fusion|2009|231
Tungsten transport in JET H-mode plasmas in hybrid scenario, experimental observations and modelling
|Nuclear Fusion|2014|190
Overview of the JET results in support to ITER
|Nuclear Fusion|2017|184