Dosimetric Comparison of Bone Marrow-Sparing Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Techniques for Treatment of Cervical Cancer
Loren K. Mell(University of California San Diego), Bulent Aydogan(University of Illinois Chicago), Arno J. Mundt(University of California San Diego), Kang‐Hyun Ahn(Stanford University), John C. Roeske(Loyola University Chicago), Hanifi Tiryaki(University of Illinois Chicago)
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
July 19, 2008
Cited by 188
Related Papers
Head and Neck Cancers, Version 2.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
|Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network|2020|1.4k
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Head and Neck Cancers, Version 1.2018
|Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network|2018|632
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Head and Neck Cancers, Version 1.2022
|Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network|2022|532
The report of Task Group 100 of the AAPM: Application of risk analysis methods to radiation therapy quality management
|Medical Physics|2016|529
Intensity-modulated whole pelvic radiotherapy in women with gynecologic malignancies
|International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics|2002|468