Cost Savings from Anemia Management with Biosimilar Epoetin Alfa and Increased Access to Targeted Antineoplastic Treatment: A Simulation for the EU G5 Countries

Ivo Abraham(University of Arizona), Lucy M. Han(University of Arizona), Diana Sun(University of Arizona), Karen MacDonald(Matrix Research (United States)), Matti Aapro(Clinique de Genolier)
Future Oncology
July 1, 2014
Cited by 54

Abstract

AIM: We simulated the budget impact of biosimilar erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) in EU G5 countries. MATERIALS & METHODS: Three models were built to estimate the number of patients who could be provided with antineoplastic therapy with rituximab, bevacizumab or trastuzumab from cost savings of biosimilar erythropoietin use in a hypothetical panel of 100,000 patients. The associated number of patients needed to convert to biosimilar ESA to provide such treatments was also calculated. RESULTS: Under fixed dosing, the savings from 100% conversion were €110,592,159, translating into an additional 9770 rituximab, 3912 bevacizumab, or 3713 trastuzumab treatments. Under weight-based dosing, the savings from 100% conversion were €146,170,333, corresponding to an additional 12,913 rituximab, 5171 bevacizumab or 4908 trastuzumab treatments. The number of patients needed to convert ranged from four to 51. CONCLUSION: Using biosimilar ESA for supportive cancer care yields significant savings and increases accessibility to primary antineoplastic therapy in a budget neutral way.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis