A quality assessment survey of SNP genotyping laboratories

Päivi Lahermo(University of Helsinki), Ulrika Liljedahl(Uppsala University), Grethe I.G. Alnæs(Norwegian Cancer Society), Tomas Axelsson(Uppsala University), Anthony J. Brookes(Karolinska Institutet), Pekka Ellonen(Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare), Per‐Henrik Groop(Folkhälsans Forskningscentrum), Christer Halldén(Lund University), Dan Holmberg(Umeå University), Kristina Holmberg(KTH Royal Institute of Technology), Mauri Keinänen, Katrin Kepp(University of Tartu), Juha Kere(Karolinska Institutet), P. Kiviluoma(Karolinska University Hospital), Vessela N. Kristensen(Norwegian Cancer Society), Cecilia M. Lindgren(Karolinska University Hospital), Jacob Odeberg(KTH Royal Institute of Technology), Pia Osterman(Umeå University), Maija Parkkonen(University of Helsinki), Janna Saarela(Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland), Maria Sterner(Lund University), Linda Strömqvist(Karolinska Institutet), Ulvi Gerst Talas(Asper Biotech (Estonia)), Maija Wessman(Folkhälsans Forskningscentrum), Aarno Palotie(University of Helsinki), Ann-Christine Syvänen(Uppsala University)
Human Mutation
June 19, 2006
Cited by 21

Abstract

To survey the quality of SNP genotyping, a joint Nordic quality assessment (QA) round was organized between 11 laboratories in the Nordic and Baltic countries. The QA round involved blinded genotyping of 47 DNA samples for 18 or six randomly selected SNPs. The methods used by the participating laboratories included all major platforms for small- to medium-size SNP genotyping. The laboratories used their standard procedures for SNP assay design, genotyping, and quality control. Based on the joint results from all laboratories, a consensus genotype for each DNA sample and SNP was determined by the coordinator of the survey, and the results from each laboratory were compared to this genotype. The overall genotyping accuracy achieved in the survey was excellent. Six laboratories delivered genotype data that were in full agreement with the consensus genotype. The average accuracy per SNP varied from 99.1 to 100% between the laboratories, and it was frequently 100% for the majority of the assays for which SNP genotypes were reported. Lessons from the survey are that special attention should be given to the quality of the DNA samples prior to genotyping, and that a conservative approach for calling the genotypes should be used to achieve a high accuracy.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis