A comparison of image interpretation times in full field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis

Susan Astley(University of Manchester), Fiona J. Gilbert(University of Cambridge), Sophie Connor(University of Manchester), Ursula Beetles(Manchester Academic Health Science Centre), Mary Wilson(St Mary's Hospital), Jamie C. Sergeant(Manchester Academic Health Science Centre), Sigrid Whiteside, Catriona Tate(University of Manchester), Yit Yoong Lim(Wythenshawe Hospital), Caroline Boggis, Helen Entwistle, Julie Morris
Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE
March 28, 2013
10.1117/12.2006039
Cited by 6

Related Papers

Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal
|BMJ|2020|3.3k
International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening
|Nature|2020|3.1k
Germline BRCA mutation and outcome in young-onset breast cancer (POSH): a prospective cohort study
|The Lancet Oncology|2018|501
Prevention and screening in BRCA mutation carriers and other breast/ovarian hereditary cancer syndromes: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for cancer prevention and screening
|Annals of Oncology|2016|404
Mammographic density adds accuracy to both the Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail breast cancer risk models in a prospective UK screening cohort
|Breast Cancer Research|2015|258