Relative Impact of Nucleotide and Copy Number Variation on Gene Expression Phenotypes

Barbara E. Stranger(Broad Institute), Matthew S. Forrest(Broad Institute), Mark Dunning(Broad Institute), Catherine Ingle(Broad Institute), Claude Beazley(Broad Institute), Natalie Thorne(Broad Institute), Richard Redon(Broad Institute), Christine Bird(Broad Institute), Anna Grassi(Broad Institute), Charles Lee(Broad Institute), Chris Tyler‐Smith(Broad Institute), Nigel Carter(Broad Institute), Stephen W. Scherer(Broad Institute), Simon Tavaré(Broad Institute), Panagiotis Deloukas(Broad Institute), Matthew E. Hurles(Broad Institute), Emmanouil T. Dermitzakis(Broad Institute)
Science
February 8, 2007
Cited by 1,781Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Extensive studies are currently being performed to associate disease susceptibility with one form of genetic variation, namely, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). In recent years, another type of common genetic variation has been characterized, namely, structural variation, including copy number variants (CNVs). To determine the overall contribution of CNVs to complex phenotypes, we have performed association analyses of expression levels of 14,925 transcripts with SNPs and CNVs in individuals who are part of the International HapMap project. SNPs and CNVs captured 83.6% and 17.7% of the total detected genetic variation in gene expression, respectively, but the signals from the two types of variation had little overlap. Interrogation of the genome for both types of variants may be an effective way to elucidate the causes of complex phenotypes and disease in humans.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis