Analysis of Three Factors Possibly Influencing the Outcome of a Science Review Process

John Jairo Araujo(Universidad de Manizales), Tanja Popović, Angela Calugar(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Neelam Ghiya(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)

Accountability in Research

January 14, 2014

10.1080/08989621.2013.848798

Cited by 1

Related Papers

Transition to adulthood and transfer to adult care of adolescents with congenital heart disease: a global consensus statement of the ESC Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (ACNAP), the ESC Working Group on Adult Congenital Heart Disease (WG ACHD), the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), the Pan-African Society of Cardiology (PASCAR), the Asia-Pacific Pediatric Cardiac Society (APPCS), the Inter-American Society of Cardiology (IASC), the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ), the International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ISACHD), the World Heart Federation (WHF), the European Congenital Heart Disease Organisation (ECHDO), and the Global Alliance for Rheumatic and Congenital Hearts (Global ARCH)

|European Heart Journal|2021|140

CDC grand rounds: Newborn screening and improved outcomes

|Unknown|2012|92

Molecular Epidemiology of Diphtheria

|The Journal of Infectious Diseases|2000|79

COVID-19 in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease

|Journal of the American College of Cardiology|2021|76

CDC Grand Rounds: preventing hospital-associated venous thromboembolism.

|PubMed|2014|44