Understanding flood regime changes in Europe: a state-of-the-art assessment

Julia Hall(TU Wien), Berit Arheimer(Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute), Marco Borga(University of Padua), Rudolf Brázdil(Masaryk University), Pierluigi Claps(Politecnico di Torino), Andrea Kiss(TU Wien), Thomas Kjeldsen(University of Bath), Jūratė Kriaučiūnienė(Lithuanian Energy Institute), Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz(Instytut Środowiska Rolniczego i Leśnego Polskiej Akademii Nauk), M. Lang, María Carmen Llasat(Universitat de Barcelona), Neil Macdonald(University of Liverpool), Neil McIntyre(The University of Queensland), Luis Mediero(Universidad Politécnica de Madrid), Bruno Merz(University of Potsdam), Ralf Merz(Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research), Péter Molnár(ETH Zurich), Alberto Montanari(University of Bologna), Clemens Neuhold(Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft), Juraj Párajka(TU Wien), Rui A. P. Perdigão(TU Wien), Lenka Plavcová(TU Wien), Magdalena Rogger(TU Wien), José Luis Salinas(TU Wien), Éric Sauquet, Christoph Schär(ETH Zurich), Ján Szolgay(Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava), Alberto Viglione(TU Wien), Günter Blöschl
Hydrology and earth system sciences
July 30, 2014
Cited by 622Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Abstract. There is growing concern that flooding is becoming more frequent and severe in Europe. A better understanding of flood regime changes and their drivers is therefore needed. The paper reviews the current knowledge on flood regime changes in European rivers that has traditionally been obtained through two alternative research approaches. The first approach is the data-based detection of changes in observed flood events. Current methods are reviewed together with their challenges and opportunities. For example, observation biases, the merging of different data sources and accounting for nonlinear drivers and responses. The second approach consists of modelled scenarios of future floods. Challenges and opportunities associated with flood change scenarios are discussed such as fully accounting for uncertainties in the modelling cascade and feedbacks. To make progress in flood change research, we suggest that a synthesis of these two approaches is needed. This can be achieved by focusing on long duration records and flood-rich and flood-poor periods rather than on short duration flood trends only, by formally attributing causes of observed flood changes, by validating scenarios against observed flood regime dynamics, and by developing low-dimensional models of flood changes and feedbacks. The paper finishes with a call for a joint European flood change research network.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis