Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care

Neil Campbell(University of Aberdeen), Elizabeth Murray(University College London), Janet Darbyshire(MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL), Jon Emery(University of Western Australia), Andrew Farmer(Primary Health Care), Frances Griffiths(University of Warwick), Bruce Guthrie(University of Dundee), Helen Lester, Philip Wilson(University of Glasgow), Ann Louise Kinmonth(University of Cambridge)
Cited by 1,371Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Complex interventions are “built up from a number of components, which may act both independently and interdependently.”1 2 Many health service activities should be considered as complex. Evaluating complex interventions can pose a considerable challenge and requires a substantial investment of time. Unless the trials illuminate processes and mechanisms they often fail to provide useful information. If the result is negative, we are left wondering whether the intervention is inherently ineffective (either because the intervention was inadequately developed or because all similar interventions are ineffective), whether it was inadequately applied or applied in an inappropriate context, or whether the trial used an inappropriate design, comparison groups or outcomes. If there is a positive effect, it can be hard to judge how the results of the trial might be applied to a different context (box 1).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis