Clinical outcomes of rectal neuroendocrine tumors ≤ 10 mm following endoscopic resection

Gwang‐Un Kim(Asan Medical Center), Kyung‐Jo Kim(University of Ulsan), Seung‐Mo Hong(Asan Medical Center), Eunsil Yu(Ulsan College), Dong‐Hoon Yang(Asan Medical Center), Kee Wook Jung(Asan Medical Center), Byong Duk Ye(Asan Medical Center), Jeong‐Sik Byeon(University of Ulsan), Seung‐Jae Myung(Ulsan College), Suk‐Kyun Yang(University of Ulsan), Jin-Ho Kim(Ulsan College)
Endoscopy
November 28, 2013
Cited by 56

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: This study was conducted to determine the clinical outcome of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs)≤ 10 mm following conventional endoscopic resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 107 patients who underwent conventional endoscopic treatment for rectal NETs (median size 5.0 mm [range 1.0-10.0]) were followed up for a median of 31 months (range 13-121). The following data were analyzed: lesion characteristics, clinical outcomes, and histological features determined using tissue microarray analysis (TMA), including the mitotic count and the Ki-67 index. RESULTS: En bloc removal was achieved for all tumors, and the complete resection rate was 49.5% (53/107). Resection margin status was indeterminate in 37 patients (34.6%) and positive in 17 (15.9%). Rectal NETs in 71 patients demonstrated a score of ≤2 % on the Ki-67 index and<2 for mitotic count on TMA. In another 28 tumors that did not undergo TMA, the mitotic count was 0-1 per 10 high-power fields. Neither recurrence nor metastasis was noted during the follow-up period following resection. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal NETs (≤10 mm in size) appear to demonstrate benign behavior based on the mitotic count and the Ki-67 index. These results suggest that the outcome of rectal NETs (≤10 mm in size) following conventional endoscopic resection might be comparatively excellent, regardless of the resection margin status. However, long term follow-up data are required to confirm this.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis