Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia is clinically distinct from unclassifiable myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms

Sa A. Wang(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Robert P. Hasserjian(Harvard University Press), Patricia S. Fox(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Heesun J. Rogers(Cleveland Clinic), Julia T. Geyer(Cornell University), Devon Chabot‐Richards(University of New Mexico), Elizabeth P. Weinzierl(Stanford University), Joseph Hatem(University of Pennsylvania), Jesse Jaso(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Rashmi Kanagal‐Shamanna(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Francesco C. Stingo(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Keyur P. Patel(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Meenakshi Mehrotra(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Carlos E. Bueso‐Ramos(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Ken H. Young(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Courtney D. DiNardo(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Srđan Verstovšek(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Ramón V. Tiu(Cleveland Clinic), Adam Bagg(University of Pennsylvania), Eric D. Hsi(Cleveland Clinic), Daniel A. Arber(Stanford University), Kathryn Foucar(University of New Mexico), Raja Luthra(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Attilio Orazi(Cornell University)
Blood
March 13, 2014
Cited by 204Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) is a rare subtype of myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN) largely defined morphologically. It is, unclear, however, whether aCML-associated features are distinctive enough to allow its separation from unclassifiable MDS/MPN (MDS/MPN-U). To study these 2 rare entities, 134 patient archives were collected from 7 large medical centers, of which 65 (49%) cases were further classified as aCML and the remaining 69 (51%) as MDS/MPN-U. Distinctively, aCML was associated with many adverse features and an inferior overall survival (12.4 vs 21.8 months, P = .004) and AML-free survival (11.2 vs 18.9 months, P = .003). The aCML defining features of leukocytosis and circulating myeloid precursors, but not dysgranulopoiesis, were independent negative predictors. Other factors, such as lactate dehydrogenase, circulating myeloblasts, platelets, and cytogenetics could further stratify MDS/MPN-U but not aCML patient risks. aCML appeared to have more mutated RAS (7/20 [35%] vs 4/29 [14%]) and less JAK2p.V617F (3/42 [7%] vs 10/52 [19%]), but was not statistically significant. Somatic CSF3R T618I (0/54) and CALR (0/30) mutations were not detected either in aCML or MDS/MPN-U. In conclusion, within MDS/MPN, the World Health Organization 2008 criteria for aCML identify a subgroup of patients with features clearly distinct from MDS/MPN-U. The MDS/MPN-U category is heterogeneous, and patient risk can be further stratified by a number of clinicopathological parameters.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis