Adverse effects of enalapril in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD)

John B. Kostis(Johnson University), Brent J. Shelton(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Gilbert Gosselin(Montreal Heart Institute), Claude Goulet(Montreal Heart Institute), William B. Hood(University of Rochester), Robert M. Kohn(University at Buffalo, State University of New York), Spencer H. Kubo(University of Minnesota), Eleanor Schron, Melvin B. Weiss(New York Medical College), Park W. Willis(Michigan State University), James B. Young(Baylor College of Medicine), Jeffrey L. Probstfield(Fred Hutch Cancer Center)
American Heart Journal
February 1, 1996
Cited by 157Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

In the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (LVD), enalapril or placebo was administered in a double-blind fashion to 6797 participants with ejection fraction < or = 0.35. During 40 months' average follow-up, 28.1% of participants randomized to enalapril reported side effects compared with 16.0% in the placebo group (p < 0.0001). Enalapril use was associated with a higher rate of symptoms related to hypotension (14.8% vs 7.1%, p < 0.0001), azotemia (3.8% vs 1.6%, p < 0.0001), cough (5.0% vs 2.0%, p < 0.0001), fatigue (5.8% vs 3.5%, p < 0.0001), hyperkalemia (1.2% vs 0.4%, p = 0.0002), and angioedema (0.4% vs 0.1%, p < 0.05). Side effects resulted in discontinuation of blinded therapy in 15.2% of the enalapril group compared with 8.6% in the placebo group (p < 0.0001). Thus enalapril is well tolerated by patients with LVD; however, hypotension, azotemia, cough, fatigue, and other side effects result in discontinuation of therapy in a significant minority of patients.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis