The Price of Tumor Control: An Analysis of Rare Side Effects of Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy in Metastatic Melanoma from the Ipilimumab Network

Caroline Voskens(Universitätsklinikum Erlangen), Simone M. Goldinger(University Hospital of Zurich), Carmen Loquai(Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz), Caroline Robert(Institut Gustave Roussy), Katharina C. Kaehler, Carola Berking(LMU Klinikum), Tanja Bergmann(Universitätsklinikum Erlangen), Clemens L. Bockmeyer(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Thomas Eigentler(University Children's Hospital Tübingen), Michael Fluck(Fachklinik Hornheide), Claus Garbe(University Children's Hospital Tübingen), Ralf Gutzmer(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Stephan Grabbe(Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz), Axel Hauschild, Rüdiger Hein(Technical University of Munich), Gheorghe Hundorfean(Universitätsklinikum Erlangen), Armin Justich(Graz University Hospital), Ulrich Keller(Technical University of Munich), Christina L. Klein(Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz), Christine Mateus(Institut Gustave Roussy), Peter Mohr(Elbe Kliniken Stade-Buxtehude), Sylvie Paetzold(Goethe University Frankfurt), Imke Satzger(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Dirk Schadendorf(Essen University Hospital), Marc Schlaeppi(University of St.Gallen), Gerold Schuler(Universitätsklinikum Erlangen), Beatrice Schuler‐Thurner(Universitätsklinikum Erlangen), Uwe Trefzer(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Jens Ulrich(Klinikum Coburg), Julia Vaübel(Essen University Hospital), Roger von Moos(Kantonsspital Graubünden), Patrik Weder(University of St.Gallen), Tabea Wilhelm(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Daniela Göppner(University Hospital Magdeburg), Reinhard Dummer(University Hospital of Zurich), Lucie Heinzerling(University of St.Gallen)
PLoS ONE
January 14, 2013
Cited by 470Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ipilimumab, a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) blocking antibody, has been approved for the treatment of metastatic melanoma and induces adverse events (AE) in up to 64% of patients. Treatment algorithms for the management of common ipilimumab-induced AEs have lead to a reduction of morbidity, e.g. due to bowel perforations. However, the spectrum of less common AEs is expanding as ipilimumab is increasingly applied. Stringent recognition and management of AEs will reduce drug-induced morbidity and costs, and thus, positively impact the cost-benefit ratio of the drug. To facilitate timely identification and adequate management data on rare AEs were analyzed at 19 skin cancer centers. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Patient files (n = 752) were screened for rare ipilimumab-associated AEs. A total of 120 AEs, some of which were life-threatening or even fatal, were reported and summarized by organ system describing the most instructive cases in detail. Previously unreported AEs like drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), granulomatous inflammation of the central nervous system, and aseptic meningitis, were documented. Obstacles included patientś delay in reporting symptoms and the differentiation of steroid-induced from ipilimumab-induced AEs under steroid treatment. Importantly, response rate was high in this patient population with tumor regression in 30.9% and a tumor control rate of 61.8% in stage IV melanoma patients despite the fact that some patients received only two of four recommended ipilimumab infusions. This suggests that ipilimumab-induced antitumor responses can have an early onset and that severe autoimmune reactions may reflect overtreatment. CONCLUSION: The wide spectrum of ipilimumab-induced AEs demands doctor and patient awareness to reduce morbidity and treatment costs and true ipilimumab success is dictated by both objective tumor responses and controlling severe side effects.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis