Predicting infections in high‐risk patients with myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia treated with azacitidine: Aretrospective multicenter study

Drorit Merkel(Tel Aviv University), Kalman Filanovsky(Kaplan Medical Center), Anat Gafter‐Gvili(Tel Aviv University), Liat Vidal(Tel Aviv University), Ariel Aviv(Emek Medical Center), Moshe E. Gatt(Hadassah Medical Center), Itay Silbershatz(Wolfson Medical Center), Yair Herishanu(Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center), Ariela Arad(Laniado Hospital), Tamar Tadmor(Technion – Israel Institute of Technology), Najib Dally(Rebecca Sieff Hospital), Anatoly Nemets(Barzilai Medical Center), Ory Rouvio(Soroka Medical Center), Aharon Ronson(Shaare Zedek Medical Center), Katrin Herzog‐Tzarfati(Assaf Harofeh Medical Center), Luiza Akria(Western Galilee Hospital), Andrei Braester(Western Galilee Hospital), Ilana Hellmann(Meir Medical Center), Shay Yeganeh(Hillel Yaffe Medical Center), Arnon Nagler(Tel Aviv University), Ronit Leiba(Rambam Health Care Campus), Moshe Mittelman(Tel Aviv University), Yishai Ofran(Technion – Israel Institute of Technology)
American Journal of Hematology
November 27, 2012
Cited by 67Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Hypomethylating agents have become the standard therapy for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). In Israel, azacitidine (AZA) is routinely used. Yet, infectious complications are common during AZA therapy. The current study was aimed to evaluate the incidence and predisposing risk factors for infections in AZA-treated patients. This retrospective study included patients treated with AZA in 18 Israeli medical institutions between 2008 and 2011. Data on 184 patients [157 high-risk MDS and 27 acute myeloid leukemia (AML)], with a median age of 71.6 (range 29-92) were recorded. Overall, 153 infectious events were reported during 928 treatment cycles (16.5%) administered to 100 patients. One hundred fourteen, 114/153 (75%) events required hospitalization and 30 (19.6%) were fatal. In a univariate analysis, unfavorable cytogenetics, low neutrophil, hemoglobin (Hb) and platelet (PLT) counts were found to be associated with infections (24.4% vs. 12.9%, P < 0.0001; 27% vs. 13.5%, P < 0.0001; 20.4% vs. 11%, P < 0.0001 and 29.2% vs. 14.2%, P < 0.0001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, only low Hb level, low PLT count, and unfavorable cytogenetics remained significant. Prior to therapy, poor cytogenetics, PLT count below 20 × 10⁹/L and neutrophil count below 0.5 × 10⁹/L were predictive of the risk of infection during the first two cycles of therapy. In conclusion, patients with unfavorable cytogenetics, presenting with low neutrophil and PLT counts, are susceptible to infections. Evaluation of infection risk should be repeated prior to each cycle. Patients with poor cytogenetics in whom AZA is prescribed despite low PLT count are particularly at high risk for infections and infection prophylaxis may be considered.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis