Progesterone vaginal gel for the reduction of recurrent preterm birth: primary results from a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial

John O’Brien(Central Baptist Hospital), C. D. Adair(University of Tennessee at Chattanooga), David F. Lewis(Louisiana State University in Shreveport), David Hall(Stellenbosch University), Emily DeFranco(Washington University in St. Louis), Shalini Fusey(Government Medical College), Priya Soma‐Pillay(University of Pretoria), Kathy B. Porter(University of South Alabama), H. How(University of Cincinnati), R C. Schackis(University of the Witwatersrand), Daniel P. Eller(GI Specialists of Georgia (United States)), Yamini Trivedi(Cadila Healthcare (India)), George VanBuren(University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center), Meena Khandelwal(Cooper University Hospital), Kenneth F. Trofatter(Medical University of South Carolina), D. Vidyadhari(Mediciti Institute of Medical Sciences), Jaya Vijayaraghavan(Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research), J. W. Weeks(Norton Healthcare), Bonnie J. Dattel(Eastern Virginia Medical School), Edward R. Newton(East Carolina University), Cynthia Chazotte(Albert Einstein College of Medicine), Guillermo J. Valenzuela(Arrowhead Regional Medical Center), Pavel Calda(Charles University), M. Bsharat(IQVIA (United States)), George W. Creasy
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
September 26, 2007
Cited by 294Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Preterm birth is the leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Treatment of preterm labor with tocolysis has not been successful in improving infant outcome. The administration of progesterone and related compounds has been proposed as a strategy to prevent preterm birth. The objective of this trial was to determine whether prophylactic administration of vaginal progesterone reduces the risk of preterm birth in women with a history of spontaneous preterm birth. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled, multinational trial enrolled and randomized 659 pregnant women with a history of spontaneous preterm birth. Between 18 + 0 and 22 + 6 weeks of gestation, patients were assigned randomly to once-daily treatment with either progesterone vaginal gel or placebo until either delivery, 37 weeks' gestation or development of preterm rupture of membranes. The primary outcome was preterm birth at </= 32 weeks of gestation. The trial was analyzed using an intent-to-treat strategy. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar in the two treatment groups. Progesterone did not decrease the frequency of preterm birth at </= 32 weeks. There was no difference between the groups with respect to the mean gestational age at delivery, infant morbidity or mortality or other maternal or neonatal outcome measures. Adverse events during the course of treatment were similar for the two groups. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic treatment with vaginal progesterone did not reduce the frequency of recurrent preterm birth (</= 32 weeks) in women with a history of spontaneous preterm birth. The effect of progesterone administration in patients at high risk for preterm delivery as determined by methods other than history alone (e.g. sonographic cervical length) requires further investigation.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis