Obesity Classification in Military Personnel: A Comparison of Body Fat, Waist Circumference, and Body Mass Index Measurements

Katie M. Heinrich(University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa), Nattinee Jitnarin(University of Missouri–Kansas City), Richard R. Suminski(Kansas City University), LaVerne A. Berkel(University of Missouri–Kansas City), Christine M. Hunter(National Institutes of Health), Lisa Alvarez(Baylor College of Medicine), Antionette R. Brundige(Kirtland Air Force Base), Alan L. Peterson, John P. Foreyt(Baylor College of Medicine), C. Keith Haddock(University of Missouri–Kansas City), Walker S. C. Poston(University of Missouri–Kansas City)
Military Medicine
January 1, 2008
Cited by 66Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate obesity classifications from body fat percentage (BF%), body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference (WC). METHODS: A total of 451 overweight/obese active duty military personnel completed all three assessments. RESULTS: Most were obese (men, 81%; women, 98%) using National Institutes of Health (NIH) BF% standards (men, >25%; women, >30%). Using the higher World Health Organization (WHO) BF >35% standard, 86% of women were obese. BMI (55.5% and 51.4%) and WC (21.4% and 31.9%) obesity rates were substantially lower for men and women, respectively (p < 0.05). BMI/WC were accurate discriminators for BF% obesity (theta for all comparisons >0.75, p < 0.001). Optimal cutoff points were lower than NIH/WHO standards; WC = 100 cm and BMI = 29 maximized sensitivity and specificity for men, and WC = 79 cm and BMI = 25.5 (NIH) or WC = 83 cm and BMI = 26 (WHO) maximized sensitivity and specificity for women. CONCLUSIONS: Both WC and BMI measures had high rates of false negatives compared to BF%. However, at a population level, WC/BMI are useful obesity measures, demonstrating fair-to-high discriminatory power.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis